1937
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/97.6.423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Effects of Radiation in the Solar System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
289
0
4

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
289
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The case e > 1 describes the case when the particle is ejected from the Solar System. (40), we obtain Poynting-Robertson effect (Robertson 1937, Klačka 1992a:…”
Section: Klačka 1992b)mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The case e > 1 describes the case when the particle is ejected from the Solar System. (40), we obtain Poynting-Robertson effect (Robertson 1937, Klačka 1992a:…”
Section: Klačka 1992b)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The second case, closely connected with the relativistic equation of motion for a free particle under the action of electromagnetic radiation, was presented by Einstein (1905), who calculated the change of energy and light pressure at arbitrary angle of incidence on a plane mirror. Robertson (1937) subsequently derived a correct equation of motion for a perfectly absorbing spherical particle. This result has been applied to astronomical problems for several decades and is known as the Poynting-Robertson (P-R) effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The improved derivation take into account arbitrary optical properties of particle with material distributed in a spherically symmetric way. The improved derivation leads to the same result for the case considered in Robertson (1937). The relativistic derivation of the PR effect can be generalized also for the solar wind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Again, we would expect to see a change as the spacecraft spins down. A final possibility is the Poynting Robertson effect [Robertson, 1937]. This effect, which is viewed in celestial mechanics as an aberration, is due to the conservation of momentum of photons reradiated from the satellite both along and opposite the motion.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%