2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.10893
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical interplay of disc thickness and the interstellar gas: implication for the longevity of spiral density waves

Soumavo Ghosh,
Chanda J. Jog

Abstract: A typical galactic disc has a finite thickness and in addition to stars it also contains a finite amount of interstellar gas. Here, we investigate the physical impact of the finite thickness of a galactic disc on the disc stability against the non-axisymmetric perturbations and on the longevity of the spiral density waves, with and without the presence of gas. The longevity is quantified via group velocity of density wavepackets. The galactic disc is first modelled as a collisionless stellar disc with finite h… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that radiation pressure from the disk may puff up the height of this region (e.g., Emmering et al 1992;Murray et al 1995;Chiang & Murray 1996;Czerny & Hryniewicz 2011;Elvis 2017;Baskin & Laor 2018) and provide a covering factor that is large enough to explain the BLR observations, which will ease the restriction of polytropic index. However, a thicker disk may potentially provide stability against non-axisymmetric perturbation and reduce the lifetimes of the spiral arms (Ghosh & Jog 2021). An observation noted in Horne et al (2021) indicates azimuthal structures in BLRs, which adds a constraint that the lifetime of the arms cannot be too short.…”
Section: Relation Between Blrs and The Accretion Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that radiation pressure from the disk may puff up the height of this region (e.g., Emmering et al 1992;Murray et al 1995;Chiang & Murray 1996;Czerny & Hryniewicz 2011;Elvis 2017;Baskin & Laor 2018) and provide a covering factor that is large enough to explain the BLR observations, which will ease the restriction of polytropic index. However, a thicker disk may potentially provide stability against non-axisymmetric perturbation and reduce the lifetimes of the spiral arms (Ghosh & Jog 2021). An observation noted in Horne et al (2021) indicates azimuthal structures in BLRs, which adds a constraint that the lifetime of the arms cannot be too short.…”
Section: Relation Between Blrs and The Accretion Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that radiation pressure from the disk may puff up the height of this region (e.g., Emmering et al 1992;Murray et al 1995;Chiang & Murray 1996;Czerny & Hryniewicz 2011;Elvis 2017;Baskin & Laor 2018) and provide a covering factor that is large enough to explain the BLR observations, which will ease the restriction of polytropic index. However, more thick disk may potentially stabilize against non-axisymmetric perturbation and reduce the lifetime of spiral arms (Ghosh & Jog 2021). The observation in Horne et al (2021) has indicated the azimuthal structures in BLRs, which gives a constraint that the lifetime of the arms cannot be too short.…”
Section: Relation Between Blr and Accretion Diskmentioning
confidence: 99%