2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Metal to Charge-Density-Wave Junctions in an Atomic Wire Array

Abstract: We investigated the atomic scale electronic phase separation emerging from a quasi-1D charge-density-wave (CDW) state of the In atomic wire array on a Si(111) surface. Spatial variations of the CDW gap and amplitude are quantified for various interfaces of metallic and insulating CDW domains by scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy (STS). The strong anisotropy in the metal−insulator junctions is revealed with an order of magnitude difference in the interwire and intrawire junction lengths of 0.4 and 7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first case, the boundary separates metallic and insulating domains within a single In wire and typically extends over about 7 nm. In the case of an inter-wire junction, however, this characteristic length is significantly reduced to less than 0.5 nm, underlining the quasi-one-dimensional nature of the atomic wire array [234]. A similar reduction of the junction length is found for adatom/defect-induced domain boundaries.…”
Section: Phase Inhomogeneitymentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the first case, the boundary separates metallic and insulating domains within a single In wire and typically extends over about 7 nm. In the case of an inter-wire junction, however, this characteristic length is significantly reduced to less than 0.5 nm, underlining the quasi-one-dimensional nature of the atomic wire array [234]. A similar reduction of the junction length is found for adatom/defect-induced domain boundaries.…”
Section: Phase Inhomogeneitymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Within the last 30 years the Si(111)(4×1)-In surface has become a model system to study electronic and thermal transport [256], phase transitions [102,107,117,237] as well as atomic scale defects [234] and fluctuations [257,258] in low-dimensional materials. Since its discovery, the (4×1) phase has been examined by a large number of different experimental methods, including LEED [117,259], I(V)-LEED [195], RHEED [116,260,261], reflective high-energy positron diffraction (RHEPD) [262], X-ray diffraction (XRD) [263], angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) [12,153,250], Core-level PES [264], Auger-electron spectroscopy (AES) [260], electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) [265,266], reflectance anisotropy spectroscopy (RAS) [267][268][269][270], Raman spectroscopy [240,269,271], electrical transport measurements [261,272], and STM [125,234,255,[273][274][275]. From a theory perspective, the system has been investigated by density functional theory (DFT) [276,277] and other approaches…”
Section: The (4×1) Metallic Zigzag Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations