Numerical simulations of rotating turbulence have given rise to "unexpected results": An increasing V did not lead to the "expected" route to a 2D state. A recent model of turbulence leads to a new number N K͑nV͒ 21 (K and n are turbulent kinetic energy and viscosity) so that DNS (direct numerical simulation) and LES (large eddy simulation) correspond to N , 1 and N . 1. In the first case, the energy cascade is suppressed, while in the second case there exists an inertial spectrum which is an equilibrium of quasi -2D-3D modes. With these ingredients, we reproduce DNS and LES data. [S0031-9007(96)02204-1] PACS numbers: 47.27.Te, 47.32. -y Recent numerical simulations data on rotating turbulence are difficult to interpret if one adopts the Taylor-Proudman theorem; to wit, as V increases, rotating turbulence should tend to a 2D state with L y ͑vertical͒ ¿ L h ͑horizontal͒. DNS (direct numerical simulation) and LES (large eddy simulation) results do not confirm such expectations. First, early DNS [1-3] and experiments [4] confirmed the trend toward 2D but further DNS work [5] with larger V yielded the opposite result: L y ͞L h first grows with V but then decreases returning toward a 3D state. Second, using LES, the tendency toward 2D was seen, and it was thought that lateral ͑L 11,3 ͒ and longitudinal ͑L 33,3 ͒ vertical length scales would both be larger than L h . It was, however, found [6,7] that L 11,3 ¿ L h , but L 33,3 ϳ L h . It was stated that [7] "the decoupling was unexpected especially considering the strong coupling between vertical and horizontal fluctuations," and that [6] "most striking is the large growth rate in L 11,3 which attains values between 5-10 larger than L 33,3 ."We show that both DNS-LES results can be reproduced and understood on the basis of a new hierarchy of regimes which we construct using a recent model previously tested on a variety of other data [8,9]. For large V, we show that there exist two quite different regimes separated by the new number N K͞nV (K is the turbulent kinetic energy and n is the viscosity). For N , 1, strong rotation suppresses the energy cascade altogether. No inertial regime, defined by the constancy of the energy flux, develops. In a freely decaying case, viscosity remains the only operating mechanism, and, in the absence of energy transfer, an initially isotropic 3D turbulence remains thus and never tends towards a 2D state. This explains the DNS data. For N . 1, the energy cascade is restored and the flow consists of mutually interacting 2D and 3D states. We further show that L 33,3 belongs to a 3D state (where all lengths are of the same order), while L 11,3 belongs to a 2D state and, thus, L 11,3 ¿ L 33,3 ϳ L h . This explains the different behavior vs V found in LES [6,7]. We also compute the power law exponents for energy and length scales for freely decaying rotating turbulence and show that the results reproduce LES data [7,10]. The nonlinear interactions, though weakened, are the main cause of 2D state which is not of the Proudman-Taylor type since th...