2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.98.052103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical phase transition in drifted Brownian motion

Abstract: We study the occupation fluctuations of drifted Brownian motion in a closed interval, and show that they undergo a dynamical phase transition in the long-time limit without an additional low-noise limit. This phase transition is similar to wetting and depinning transitions, and arises here as a switching between paths of the random motion leading to different occupations. For low occupations, the motion essentially stays in the interval for some fraction of time before escaping, while for high occupations the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the residence-time fluctuations, our main conclusion is the robustness of the dynamical phase transition observed by Nyawo and Touchette [34] for biased Brownian motion in continuous 1D space. One advantage of studying this observable on the lattice (as opposed to the continuum) is that we were able to obtain an explicit expression for the rate function that applies to the ARW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For the residence-time fluctuations, our main conclusion is the robustness of the dynamical phase transition observed by Nyawo and Touchette [34] for biased Brownian motion in continuous 1D space. One advantage of studying this observable on the lattice (as opposed to the continuum) is that we were able to obtain an explicit expression for the rate function that applies to the ARW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Yet, a systematic procedure allows one to potentially infer an auxiliary dynamics which effectively realizes the constraint on trajectories [81][82][83]. The auxiliary dynamics considered previously are for exclusion processes [84][85][86][87], particle-based diffusive systems restricted to small noise regimes [88,89] and non-interacting cases in specific potentials [90][91][92]. Interestingly, recent works have also put forward explicit solutions in active systems for a mean-field dynamics [93] and for a many-body dynamics with pair-wise forces [36].…”
Section: Phase Transitions In Biased Ensemblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, computing G is a highly non-trivial procedure for many-body systems. The explicit solutions considered so far concern either exclusion processes [102][103][104] or particle-based diffusive systems restricted to small noise regimes [105,106] and non-interacting cases in some specific potentials [107][108][109].…”
Section: B Dynamical Bias and Modified Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%