2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.97.085152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical recovery of SU(2) symmetry in the mass-quenched Hubbard model

Abstract: We use non-equilibrium dynamical mean-field theory with iterative perturbation theory as an impurity solver to study the recovery of SU (2) symmetry in real-time following a hopping integral parameter quench from a mass-imbalanced to a mass-balanced single-band Hubbard model at half-filling. A dynamical order parameter γ(t) is defined to characterize the evolution of the system towards SU (2) symmetry. By comparing the momentum dependent occupation from an equilibrium calculation (with the SU (2) symmetric Ham… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the predicted spin gap physics has not been observed numerically for systems away from commensurate filling [25]. On the other hand, crystallization was found at both 1/2 [26] and 1/3 filling [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the predicted spin gap physics has not been observed numerically for systems away from commensurate filling [25]. On the other hand, crystallization was found at both 1/2 [26] and 1/3 filling [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The existence of a prethermal regime is important because realistic systems usually contain integrabilitybreaking perturbations that support it, and because the thermalization (or more specifically, the energy absorption) time τ can correspond to experimentally accessible time scales. The existence of such a regime also implies that there is interesting physics to be found at intermediate times 0 < t < τ [52,59], where one may use timedependent perturbations to drive dynamical phase transitions [60][61][62][63], control interactions [64,65], or engineer phase transitions and topological phases [66][67][68][69][70].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%