2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.052705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical resonant neutralization of low-energy Na+ ions scattered from Au(111), Pd(111), Cu(111), and Cu(110) surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…at incident angle a ¼ 1 0 for H 0 projectiles with energy of E p˛[ 0. 25,25] keV (ref. 28) studied here (the plausible of the choosing of this surface altitude range can be seen by: (i) the Z˛ [2,3] a.u.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…at incident angle a ¼ 1 0 for H 0 projectiles with energy of E p˛[ 0. 25,25] keV (ref. 28) studied here (the plausible of the choosing of this surface altitude range can be seen by: (i) the Z˛ [2,3] a.u.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The negative ion conversion mechanism of atomic particle scattering at grazing angles on metal surfaces has already been comprehensively studied. [22][23][24][25] In this case, charge-exchange is dominated by electronic resonant transitions between states of metal surface and the affinity level of a projectile. When the projectile approaches the surface, its energy level is drastically shied downward by the image potential, which increases with decreasing distance between the projectile and the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these projectile/surface systems: Li/graphene and H/HOPG, the charge fractions dependence on the incoming energy are related to the suppression of the hybridization width. Also, a nonmonotonous dependence of charge transfer versus energy has been found in different projectile-target combinations, where the dependence is attributed to the presence of a projected band gap and surface states within it [35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Final Charge States Of the Projectilementioning
confidence: 99%