2001
DOI: 10.1039/b006660p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical structure of AgxCu1-xI (x=0.99–0.80) in ionic and superionic phases studied by solid 63Cu and 127I NMR spin–lattice relaxation time measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most likely interpretation of the thermally activated mechanism is that it is associated with modulation of electric field gradients due to the hopping of iodine atoms throughout the lattice. A combination of these two relaxation mechanisms has been previously reported for 127 I relaxation in Ag x Cu 1– x I. , By this model, the van Kranendonk mechanism is approximately 100 times more efficient for 127 I in PbI 2 than it is for the Ag x Cu 1– x I compounds, and the activation energy for the thermally activated process in PbI 2 is substantially lower than for Ag x Cu 1– x I, indicating a difference in the effectiveness of the two relaxation mechanisms in the two materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The most likely interpretation of the thermally activated mechanism is that it is associated with modulation of electric field gradients due to the hopping of iodine atoms throughout the lattice. A combination of these two relaxation mechanisms has been previously reported for 127 I relaxation in Ag x Cu 1– x I. , By this model, the van Kranendonk mechanism is approximately 100 times more efficient for 127 I in PbI 2 than it is for the Ag x Cu 1– x I compounds, and the activation energy for the thermally activated process in PbI 2 is substantially lower than for Ag x Cu 1– x I, indicating a difference in the effectiveness of the two relaxation mechanisms in the two materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Therefore, the activation energy inferred from spin relaxation as shown in Fig. 4 is often significantly lower (though never higher) 66–74 than that inferred from the temperature dependence of the self-diffusion coefficient or ionic conductivity. For LiC 6 , the difference between these two activation energies was roughly a factor of 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…T 1 measurements of the sodium resonance in sodium orthophosphate and solids solutions of it with added sulfate are interpreted in terms of correlated anion reorientation and cation diffusion (69). Relaxation of 63 Cu and 127 I centers in ionic and superionic conductors appears to be due to thermally generated defects, whose energy of activation for diffusion and enthalpy of formation were determined from the NMR properties (70).…”
Section: Solid Ionic Conductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%