2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781108525404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics and Control of Autonomous Space Vehicles and Robotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete pose is found by accumulating the attitudes with alternate representations of the other vectors. It is demonstrated succinctly that the methodology may be applied, with minimal use of the dynamics, to actual space and aerial robotic manipulators attached to a vehicle in flight, a planetary rover (Vepa, 2019) or a robotic vehicle, where the attitude of the vehicle and the pose of the manipulator links or vehicle itself must be obtained. Apart from the simplicity, the fact they are non-dimensional implies that they could be used in variety of different physical solutions, by appropriate re-scaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete pose is found by accumulating the attitudes with alternate representations of the other vectors. It is demonstrated succinctly that the methodology may be applied, with minimal use of the dynamics, to actual space and aerial robotic manipulators attached to a vehicle in flight, a planetary rover (Vepa, 2019) or a robotic vehicle, where the attitude of the vehicle and the pose of the manipulator links or vehicle itself must be obtained. Apart from the simplicity, the fact they are non-dimensional implies that they could be used in variety of different physical solutions, by appropriate re-scaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HCW equations (Clohessy and Wiltshire [11]) assume that both the target body and the chaser satellite are in near locally circular orbits and that the relative perturbations acting on the chaser satellite relative to the target body are small. The HCW equations may be extended to include all the nonlinearities and Earth oblateness perturbations (Kuiack and Ulrich [12], Vepa [13]). The assumptions on which the derivation of the HCW linearized equations of relative motion is based, are quite restrictive and to initiate a change in both the change in the position and velocity of the satellite so it flies alongside or just behind the target body, the application of the continuous thrust should be done when the phase angle between the two is within certain acceptable limits.…”
Section: Of 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the closeness that can be determined by a single parameter, δ which must be relatively small and, δ = 2(x/r) + (ρ/r) 2 << 0.001,where x is the relative local vertical position coordinate of the spacecraft, r is the distance of the asteroid from the Sun and ρ is the relative distance of the spacecraft from the asteroid. (The derivation of this parameter is presented in Vepa [13]). In practice, however, for a satellite in circular co-planar orbit, with almost the same orbit radius as the asteroid, (ρ/r) 2 ≤ 0.05.…”
Section: Of 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The associated tracking problem, which involves tracking the complete state vector set point, must then be separately addressed. Typically this is done by using a barrier Lyapunov function as illustrated by Vepa [17].…”
Section: Simplified Formulation Of the Optimal Angular Rate Trajectormentioning
confidence: 99%