2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaceac
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics and Formation of the Near-resonant K2-24 System: Insights from Transit-timing Variations and Radial Velocities

Abstract: While planets between the size of Uranus and Saturn are absent within the solar system, the star K2-24 hosts two such planets, K2-24b and c, with radii equal to 5.4 Å R and 7.5 Å R , respectively. The two planets have orbital periods of 20.9days and 42.4days, residing only 1% outside the nominal 2:1 mean-motion resonance. In this work, we present results from a coordinated observing campaign to measure planet masses and eccentricities that combines radial velocity measurements from Keck/HIRES and transit-t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sample also includes Kepler-18d (Cochran et al 2011;Petigura et al 2017b) and K2-24c . Petigura et al (2018) suggest a formation scenario for the latter planet wherein the disk dissipates just as the planet begins to enter runaway accretion. Lee (2019) show that the sub-Saturn population can indeed be explained by the timing of disk dispersal, but they note as a prerequisite that their cores must be massive enough to trigger runaway accretion during the disk lifetime, 10M ⊕ .…”
Section: A Possible Formation Scenario For Kepler-177mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This sample also includes Kepler-18d (Cochran et al 2011;Petigura et al 2017b) and K2-24c . Petigura et al (2018) suggest a formation scenario for the latter planet wherein the disk dissipates just as the planet begins to enter runaway accretion. Lee (2019) show that the sub-Saturn population can indeed be explained by the timing of disk dispersal, but they note as a prerequisite that their cores must be massive enough to trigger runaway accretion during the disk lifetime, 10M ⊕ .…”
Section: A Possible Formation Scenario For Kepler-177mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following Petigura et al (2018a), we incorporated the RV mass constraints as Gaussian priors on the planet masses. We checked that this treatment is justified by verifying that the posteriors on K 1 , K 2 , and K 3 (Section 4.1) are Gaussian and uncorrelated.…”
Section: Photo-dynamical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling these TTVs can give mass constraints on the planets; however, with low signal-to-noise (S/N) data a mass-eccentricity degeneracy often remains (Lithwick et al 2012;Deck & Agol 2015). These degeneracies can sometimes be broken by RV data that provide a complementary constraint (e.g., Petigura et al 2018), or by a strong prior on eccentricity (Hadden & Lithwick 2017). We study Kepler-65 and Kepler-25 with a photodynamical model which produces synthetic RV and photometric data generated by the N-body interactions of simulated planets and compares it to the observed data to extract planetary orbital elements, masses, and radii self-consistently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%