2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1918439117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics and functional diversity of the smallest phytoplankton on the Northeast US Shelf

Abstract: Picophytoplankton are the most abundant primary producers in the ocean. Knowledge of their community dynamics is key to understanding their role in marine food webs and global biogeochemical cycles. To this end, we analyzed a 16-y time series of observations of a phytoplankton community at a nearshore site on the Northeast US Shelf. We used a size-structured population model to estimate in situ division rates for the picoeukaryote assemblage and compared the dynamics with those of the picocyanobacteriaSynechoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of phytoplankton functional groups and diversity in driving variation in primary and export production is a fundamental question in oceanography and carbon cycle science. While allometric approaches have been extensively used in oceanographic studies to scale particle size to metabolism, growth, and production (Brewin, Lavender, et al, 2010; Marañón et al, 2013; Uitz et al, 2008; White et al, 2015), our data and an emerging body of observational data (Bolaños et al, 2020; Fowler et al, 2020) suggest that the relationship between the PSD and production is more complex than previously thought. Both bottom‐up and top‐down processes, including regionally varying supply of limiting nutrients and differential grazing pressure relative to growth, are likely modes of controlling the size fractionation of the phytoplankton communities.…”
Section: Implications For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role of phytoplankton functional groups and diversity in driving variation in primary and export production is a fundamental question in oceanography and carbon cycle science. While allometric approaches have been extensively used in oceanographic studies to scale particle size to metabolism, growth, and production (Brewin, Lavender, et al, 2010; Marañón et al, 2013; Uitz et al, 2008; White et al, 2015), our data and an emerging body of observational data (Bolaños et al, 2020; Fowler et al, 2020) suggest that the relationship between the PSD and production is more complex than previously thought. Both bottom‐up and top‐down processes, including regionally varying supply of limiting nutrients and differential grazing pressure relative to growth, are likely modes of controlling the size fractionation of the phytoplankton communities.…”
Section: Implications For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…emerging body of observational data (Bolaños et al, 2020;Fowler et al, 2020) suggest that the relationship between the PSD and production is more complex than previously thought. Both bottom-up and top-down processes, including regionally varying supply of limiting nutrients and differential grazing pressure relative to growth, are likely modes of controlling the size fractionation of the phytoplankton communities.…”
Section: 1029/2020gb006702mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patterns could be explained by the long lasting summer of 2018 58 which could have shifted PPE favorable temperatures to later in the autumn while concurrent light limitation may have restricted PPE growth 37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Picophytoplankton seasonal dynamics is determined by temperature, light, nutrient concentration [35][36][37] and biotic factors 14,38 . The few studies focusing on picophytoplankton seasonality in the Baltic Sea suggest that their community composition and abundance have a strong seasonal variation 21,26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past work has assumed that changes in cell size result from two processes: carbon fixation and cell division [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. We built upon these studies by evaluating the relevance of a range of assumptions and testing models that include an additional process: cell shrinkage through exudation and respiration.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%