2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.01.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics and oscillations of generalized high-order Hopfield neural networks with mixed delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, high-order Hopfield neural networks have become the object of intensive analysis by many scholars because of their stronger approximation characteristics, faster convergence speed, larger storage capacity, and higher fault tolerance than low-order Hopfield neural networks. A lot of excellent research results about their dynamic characteristics have been obtained [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, high-order Hopfield neural networks have become the object of intensive analysis by many scholars because of their stronger approximation characteristics, faster convergence speed, larger storage capacity, and higher fault tolerance than low-order Hopfield neural networks. A lot of excellent research results about their dynamic characteristics have been obtained [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many excellent results about their dynamic characteristics have been obtained in e.g. [2,3,4,7,14,22,24,25]. Clearly, the study of the oscillations and dynamics of such models is an exciting new topic.…”
Section: An Application To Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFPS error between isolate node α(t)s(t) (42) and network x i (t) (1) without sample-data pinning control (5) Example 4.2 Consider the isolated node with both discrete and distributed delays:…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , 6, j = 1, 2 without pinning sampled-data control (5). Figure 13 shows the EFPS errors between the states of the isolated node α(t)s(t) (43) and network x i (t) (1) where z ij (t) = x ij (t)α j (t)s j (t) for i = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation