2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00245-019-09622-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of 2D Incompressible Non-autonomous Navier–Stokes Equations on Lipschitz-like Domains

Abstract: This paper concerns the tempered pullback dynamics of 2D incompressible non-autonomous Navier-Stokes equation with non-homogeneous boundary condition on Lipschitz-like domain. With the presence of a time-dependent external force f (t) which only needs to be pullback translation bounded, we establish the existence of a minimal pullback attractor with respect to a universe of tempered sets for the corresponding non-autonomous dynamical system. We then give estimate on the finite fractal dimension of the attracto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tempered pullback attractors here contain the ω-limit sets and all equilibriums for the background flow, which differs from the corresponding results in bounded smooth domain in [9], [10], [11], [15], [16], [17], [26]. Since the model considered in this paper contains delay and the domain is non-smooth, our results are a further extension of [3], [27], [28] and [39]. (b) Denoting by P(X) the family of all nonempty subsets of X and considering a family of nonempty sets D 0 = {D 0 (t) : t ∈ R} ⊂ P(X), we give some preliminary definitions and theorems on the tempered pullback dynamics theory in what follows, see [6], [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tempered pullback attractors here contain the ω-limit sets and all equilibriums for the background flow, which differs from the corresponding results in bounded smooth domain in [9], [10], [11], [15], [16], [17], [26]. Since the model considered in this paper contains delay and the domain is non-smooth, our results are a further extension of [3], [27], [28] and [39]. (b) Denoting by P(X) the family of all nonempty subsets of X and considering a family of nonempty sets D 0 = {D 0 (t) : t ∈ R} ⊂ P(X), we give some preliminary definitions and theorems on the tempered pullback dynamics theory in what follows, see [6], [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…For the Lipschitz-like case, motivated by [27,28] and based on estimates on the Stokes problem in [13] and [32], Brown, Perry and Shen [3] introduced the background flow in Lipschitz-like domains and proved the existence of the finite (fractal) dimensional universal attractor. Using the theory of pullback attractors, Yang, Qin, Lu and Ma [39] deduced the existence and regularity of pullback attractors, based on the background flow in Lipschitz-like domains. Inspired by [3], [27], [28], [37], [39] and [40], using the background flow ψ in Lipschitz-like domains which satisfies…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since J n are nonincreasing, we have that for all n ≥ n(k ) Using the energy estimates ( 27) and ( 28), the convergences (25) and Claim 1, we can deduce that ||u n (s)|| L 2 (t−h,t;V) → ||u(s)|| L 2 (t−h,t;V) .…”
Section: The Continuous Processmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Motivated by the recent results, [22][23][24][25] we will investigate the nonautonomous functional Navier-Stokes model with damping in a bounded domain Ω ⊂ R 3 which has sufficiently smooth boundary Ω; the problem for governing equations can be written as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%