2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of a new seismic isolation device based on tribological smooth rocking (TROCKSISD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the isolated superstructure is considered, an additional degree of freedom, which is the rigid rotation 𝛂 of the base isolator, has to be taken into account. For the 2DOF system (rotation 𝛂 and horizontal displacement 𝒙, Figure 7a), the equations of motion are [24]:…”
Section: Mechanical Features Of the Single Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the isolated superstructure is considered, an additional degree of freedom, which is the rigid rotation 𝛂 of the base isolator, has to be taken into account. For the 2DOF system (rotation 𝛂 and horizontal displacement 𝒙, Figure 7a), the equations of motion are [24]:…”
Section: Mechanical Features Of the Single Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TROCKSISD is an articulated device that protects the superstructure from shocks and vibrations induced by dynamic actions. The conceptual idea of this device, whose design follows the performance based seismic design criteria, is extensively illustrated in [24]. This isolator is suitable to protect from earthquakes or base vibrations slender structures such as towers or art objects of small dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous studies in the field of response control (Fantuzzi et al., 2022; Noureldin et al., 2021) and seismic isolation (Housner et al., 1996; Naeim & Kelly, 1999) have been conducted worldwide (Lin et al., 2010; Saleh & Adeli, 1998), and significant advances in the innovation of these technologies have been made (El‐Khoury & Adeli, 2013; Higashino & Okamoto, 2006). Structural control devices can be classified into three categories: “passive control” (Froli et al., 2019; Narasimhan et al., 2006; Salvatore et al., 2021), “semi active control” (Gutierrez Soto & Adeli, 2019; Naderpoor & Taghikhany, 2022; Shi et al., 2021), and “active and hybrid control” (Bitaraf et al., 2012; Kim & Adeli, 2005a) systems. Recently, in the field of seismic protection, important advancements have been made (Gutierrez Soto & Adeli, 2018; Javidan & Kim, 2022; Xu et al., 2021), and researchers focused their attention on different vibration control technologies such as tuned mass dampers (Kayabekir et al., 2022; Kim & Adeli, 2005b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Madhekar studied the application of viscous dampers on highway bridges to reduce the bearing displacements and eliminate the isolator damage [6]. The dampers are often combined with the base isolators to improve the seismic reliability of structures [7,8]. Except passive vibration control technologies, active and semiactive approaches are also developed in civil engineering to provide effective protection in earthquakes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%