1997
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.14.002499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of adaptation at high luminances: Adaptation is faster after luminance decrements than after luminance increments

Abstract: As is well known, dark adaptation in the human visual system is much slower than is recovery from darkness. We show that at high photopic luminances the situation is exactly opposite. First, we study detection thresholds for a small light flash, at various delays from decrement and increment steps in background luminance. Light adaptation is nearly complete within 100 ms after luminance decrements but takes much longer after luminance increments. Second, we compare sensitivity after equally visible pulses or s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The argument suggests that rapid acceleration at saccade onset tilts the photoreceptors, which generates a transient reduction in luminance sensitivity (Richards, 1969;Castet et al, 2001). If luminance is briefly reduced in fixating humans there is a reduction in visual sensitivity, maximal 20 -50 ms after the decrement and a relatively weak reduction in visual sensitivity up to 25 ms before the decrement (Poot et al, 1997). Thus, a simple reduction in stimulus brightness can cause a reduction in visual sensitivity that can be perceived to occur before the stimulus was even presented.…”
Section: Saccadic Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The argument suggests that rapid acceleration at saccade onset tilts the photoreceptors, which generates a transient reduction in luminance sensitivity (Richards, 1969;Castet et al, 2001). If luminance is briefly reduced in fixating humans there is a reduction in visual sensitivity, maximal 20 -50 ms after the decrement and a relatively weak reduction in visual sensitivity up to 25 ms before the decrement (Poot et al, 1997). Thus, a simple reduction in stimulus brightness can cause a reduction in visual sensitivity that can be perceived to occur before the stimulus was even presented.…”
Section: Saccadic Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, any explanation for prestimulus events must come from errors in perceived timing, which incorrectly attributes visual responses with prestimulus time epochs. Examples of this postdiction are widespread in the perceptual literature (Poot et al, 1997;Krekelberg et al, 2003;Ostendorf et al, 2006) and are thought to be caused by variable visual latencies between cells and long temporal integration times.…”
Section: Saccadic Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptation in the cone occurs on multiple timescales, with different mechanisms governing the dynamics of adaptation after light increments and decrements. Light adaptation in human observers also occurs over multiple timescales and is also strongly asymmetric with respect to light increments and decrements (Crawford, 1947;Poot et al, 1997). Beyond these superficial similarities, however, little is known about how specific physiological phenomena in the cone are propagated downstream of the photoreceptor and affect performance of the visual system.…”
Section: Rod and Cone Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychophysical threshold measurements of ON and OFF sensitivity have given mixed results (Blackwell, 1946; Krauskopf, 1980; Bowen et al, 1989; Poot et al, 1997). More complex behavioral tasks have revealed the advantage of Dark-on-Light over Light-on-Dark in reading (Buchner and Baumgartner, 2007), and the primacy of Dark texels in judging texture variance (Chubb and Nam, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%