1994
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800030050x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Ammonia Volatilization from Turkey Manure and Urea Applied to Soil

Abstract: Field measurements of NH3 volatilization from both surface‐applied and incorporated turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) manure (20 g of N m−2, which compares with 16 Mg of manure ha−1) and urea (20 g of N m−2) were made using the forced‐draft technique for a 6‐d period in early June 1991. The soil (temperature and water potential) and atmospheric parameters (relative humidity, wind speed, and air temperature) affecting NH3 volatilization rate were also measured. Ammonia losses for manure and urea followed a diurnal p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is considerably small as compared with other studies; e.g. 6 to 40% in upland soils 19) , 8 to 16% in calcareous soils 20) , and 40% in paddy soils 9) . The substantially low ammonia volatilization of applied urea was probably attributable to the experimental method as closed chamber method adopted in our study is likely to result in a low ammonia volatilization by preventing the wind-driving mass flow of NH3 gas 21) .…”
Section: In Ecet) the Increases Incontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…This value is considerably small as compared with other studies; e.g. 6 to 40% in upland soils 19) , 8 to 16% in calcareous soils 20) , and 40% in paddy soils 9) . The substantially low ammonia volatilization of applied urea was probably attributable to the experimental method as closed chamber method adopted in our study is likely to result in a low ammonia volatilization by preventing the wind-driving mass flow of NH3 gas 21) .…”
Section: In Ecet) the Increases Incontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…However, this common practice of applying litter on the surface of pastures has raised serious water-quality concerns and may limit the potential benefits that poultry litter can provide. Because surface-applied litter is completely exposed to the atmosphere, rainfall runoff can transport nutrients into nearby streams and lakes (Westerman et al, 1983;McLeod and Hegg, 1984;Edwards and Daniel, 1993;Shreve et al, 1995), and much of the ammonia nitrogen volatilizes before it can enter the soil (Chapman and Snyder, 1992;Nathan and Malzer, 1994). Poultry producers need improved management options that protect water quality by decreasing losses from poultry litter, while making the valuable nutrients more available to crop plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter is commonly used to fertilize hay fields, pastures, and other no-till cropping systems where the only available application method has been to broadcast it on the soil surface. Unfortunately, this method leaves the litter exposed to the atmosphere, allowing valuable nutrients to be carried by storm runoff into nearby streams and lakes (McLeod and Hegg, 1984;Edwards and Daniel, 1993;Shreve et al, 1995;Sharpley et al, 2001) and causing substantial nitrogen losses as the ammonia volatilizes (Brady, 1990;Chapman and Snyder, 1992;Nathan and Malzer, 1994;Sharpe et al, 2004). To help address these problems, a research team at the USDA Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) has developed a mechanized technique for applying dry poultry litter in shallow parallel bands beneath the surface of no-till agricultural systems .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%