2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2840119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of charge currents ballistically injected in GaAs by quantum interference

Abstract: The dynamics of charge currents ballistically injected in GaAs bulk and quantum wells are spatially and temporally resolved. The electrons and holes are injected with oppositely directed velocities without the use of accelerating fields by quantum interference between two photon absorption of a 200fs, 1430nm fundamental pulse and one photon absorption of the corresponding second harmonic pulse. The subsequent charge motion is followed with ∼200fs temporal and ∼1nm spatial resolution by using tightly focused op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a lag has been confirmed in our previous high-resolution pump-probe experiments, where the charge separation was found to reach a peak after more than 100 fs. [26,27] However, here we observe the peak SHG around zero probe delay. Hence, the all-optical time-resolved technique has the advantage to unambiguously distinguish the field-induced and the current-induced SHG effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Such a lag has been confirmed in our previous high-resolution pump-probe experiments, where the charge separation was found to reach a peak after more than 100 fs. [26,27] However, here we observe the peak SHG around zero probe delay. Hence, the all-optical time-resolved technique has the advantage to unambiguously distinguish the field-induced and the current-induced SHG effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…27,28 However, unlike pure spin current, in charge current the transport gives rise to a space-charge field that significantly changes the dynamics of the transport. 45 Since the space-charge field cannot be isolated from the average velocity, it is difficult to relate the electron accumulation to the initial average velocity. 45 Nevertheless, the same power dependence of charge current injection has indeed been observed in GaAs, silicon, germanium, and carbon nanotubes by measuring terahertz emission from the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 Since the space-charge field cannot be isolated from the average velocity, it is difficult to relate the electron accumulation to the initial average velocity. 45 Nevertheless, the same power dependence of charge current injection has indeed been observed in GaAs, silicon, germanium, and carbon nanotubes by measuring terahertz emission from the samples. [46][47][48] We suggest that the consistency between our experiment and the terahertz-based charge current experiments [46][47][48] is an indication that the terahertz signal detected in those experiments [46][47][48] is proportional to the charge current density initially injected, and is not influenced by the sequential charge transport dynamics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can gain more insight by fitting our fluence-dependent Δ T/T data ( Fig. 3(b)) to obtain the saturation fluence F sat 40,41 . This gives F sat = 51.5 μ J/cm 2 , corresponding to a saturated carrier density of n sat~1 .6 × 10 13 cm −2…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%