2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-014-0966-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Condensation in the Totally Asymmetric Inclusion Process

Abstract: We study the dynamics of condensation of the inclusion process on a one-dimensional periodic lattice in the thermodynamic limit, generalising recent results on finite lattices for symmetric dynamics. Our main focus is on totally asymmetric dynamics which have not been studied before, and which we also compare to exact solutions for symmetric systems. We identify all relevant dynamical regimes and corresponding time scales as a function of the system size, including a coarsening regime where clusters move on th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the ASEP particles are subject to exclusion interactions that keep them singled apart, whereas in the ASIP particles are subject to inclusion interactions that coalesce them into inseparable clusters. To avoid confusion we note that there is also a different model with the name ASIP [32,33] which will not be discussed here.…”
Section: The Asymmetric Simple Inclusion Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ASEP particles are subject to exclusion interactions that keep them singled apart, whereas in the ASIP particles are subject to inclusion interactions that coalesce them into inseparable clusters. To avoid confusion we note that there is also a different model with the name ASIP [32,33] which will not be discussed here.…”
Section: The Asymmetric Simple Inclusion Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 We similarly couple two independent random walk particles absorbed at left end 0 and right end N + 1 and two S I P particles absorbed at left end 0 and right end N + 1. The random walk jumps until absorption are performed together, and the inclusion jumps are performed only by the inclusion particles.…”
Section: We First Consider Basic Coupling (X (T) Y (T) U (T) V (T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attractive interaction as opposed to exclusion in the well-known exclusion process [12] is responsible for interesting phenomena. In the limit of small diffusion, condensation phenomena occur [1,8,9], and there is an analogue of Liggett's comparison inequality which leads to "propagation of positive correlations" for appropriately chosen initial product measures [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models share a common feature: the steady-state probability of a microstate can be expressed analytically as a function of transition rates which define the dynamics of the model. Examples of such systems are the zero-range process (ZRP) [2,3,4], closely related to its equilibrium counterpart: balls-in-boxes model (B-in-B) [5], the asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP) [6] and its totally asymmetric version (TASEP) [7], asymmetric inclusion process (ASIP) [8,9,10] and many variations on these two models [11,12,13,14,15]. In all these models, particles jump between sites of a one-or higher-dimensional lattice and the dynamics is defined by specifying the hopping rates of the particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%