2019
DOI: 10.5334/cstp.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Engagement in Citizen Science: Results from the “Yes, I do!”-Project

Abstract: Citizen science projects need to attract citizens and motivate them to dedicate their energy and time to science. Recruiting enough participants and keeping them engaged throughout the project is often a big challenge for the scientists involved. In this paper, recruiting and engagement strategies are evaluated for a successful midsize online citizen science project in the field of humanities. Quantitative measures are applied to track the quantity and quality of citizens' contributions over time, allowing und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People can also become even more interested in the topic once they engage with it further. For example, in an online transcription project where participants had to transcribe sixteenth-and seventeenthcentury handwriting, a small group of participants chose the more difficult task of deciphering sixteenth-century handwriting in preference to the easier task of deciphering the seventeenth-century handwriting (De Moor et al 2019). Although prior interest is more often assessed as a prerequisite for participation in citizen science, more research on increased interest as a result of participation would be interesting.…”
Section: Benefits and Outcomes For Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People can also become even more interested in the topic once they engage with it further. For example, in an online transcription project where participants had to transcribe sixteenth-and seventeenthcentury handwriting, a small group of participants chose the more difficult task of deciphering sixteenth-century handwriting in preference to the easier task of deciphering the seventeenth-century handwriting (De Moor et al 2019). Although prior interest is more often assessed as a prerequisite for participation in citizen science, more research on increased interest as a result of participation would be interesting.…”
Section: Benefits and Outcomes For Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustained engagement and generating the required participation levels in citizen science are of primary importance in contributing to data quality and should therefore be carefully considered (Scott and Frost, 2017;Moor et al, 2019;Serret et al, 2019). To evaluate this, we used data on the participation of the citizen scientists from the six monitoring sites.…”
Section: Participation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collected in this dataset has been used for several academic papers by members and affiliated researchers of our research team (De Moor et al, 2020;Störmer et al, 2017), a book on marriage in early modern Amsterdam directed at a broader, non-academic audience (Van Weeren & De Moor, 2019) and a study of the long-term development of marriage patterns worldwide and its implications for the position of women (Van Zanden et al, 2019). As a side-effect of this data collection, research on the learning curve of participants in this project as well as other projects on the Vele Handen platform was performed, resulting in a publication on the dynamics of Citizen Science (De Moor et al, 2019).…”
Section: Data Usability and New Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%