Dynamics of event-related potentials to trains of light and dark flashes: Responses to missing and extra stimuli in elasmobranch fish

Karamürsel, Saçit; Bullock, Theodore H.

doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90138-4

Cited by 22 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As we reported for visual OSPs (Bullock a/.. 1990. 1993Karamursel and Bullock, 1994: Prechtl and Bullock. 1992, it is similar in form and dynamics to the equivalent response seen first in fish and reptiles in the optic tectum and even in the retina after severing the optic nerve.…”

Section: Parameters Affecting the Two Types Of Ospmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Auditory Fast and Slow Omitted Stimulus Potentials and Steady-State Responses

Karamürsel¹,

Bullock²

2000

International Journal of Neuroscience

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two kinds of omitted stimulus potentials (OSP) are called "fast" and 'slow." Fast OSPs, recently found with visual stimuli, are here extended to auditory; they occur after omissions or after the end of trains of 1 to > 20 Hz clicks. Slow OSPs, long known, follow trains of 0.3 to 4 Hz. Each has its constant peak latency after the due-time of the first missing stimulus, as though the system is expecting something quite accurately on schedule. They differ in dynamics and slow OSPs require the subject to attend; fast OSPs do not. Steady-state responses (SSR) at a critical click rate of 6-7 Hz sometimes appear to alternate between two forms and OSPs may depend on which they follow. Fast OSPs can occur to the first, second and even the third omissions after the end of a train. Short conditioning periods suffice. Irregular interstimulus intervals do not reduce fast OSPs but attenuate slow OSPs.

show abstract

Section: Parameters Affecting the Two Types Of Ospmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Auditory Fast and Slow Omitted Stimulus Potentials and Steady-State Responses

Karamürsel¹,

Bullock²

2000

International Journal of Neuroscience

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such pattern violations generate characteristic voltage signatures on the human scalp called the omitted stimulus potential or the mismatch negativity (Bullock and Karamürsel, 1994; Klinke et al, 1968), which has been associated with the detection of novelty (Friedman et al, 2001; Rogers et al, 1992; Jääskeläinen et al, 2004). However, the phenomenon does not require higher brain areas or extensive networks: it has been seen in the retina (Bullock et al, 1990; Karamürsel and Bullock, 1994), and recent in vitro studies have shown that it can be robustly and precisely generated by ganglion cells, where it has been called the omitted stimulus response (OSR) (Schwartz et al, 2007a; Schwartz and Berry II, 2008). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An oscillatory circuit underlying the detection of disruptions in temporally-periodic patterns

Gao

Schwartz

Berry

et al. 2009

Network: Computation in Neural Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neurons in diverse brain areas can respond to the interruption of a regular stimulus pattern by firing bursts of spikes. Here we describe a simple model which permits such responses to periodic stimuli over a substantial frequency range. Focusing on the omitted stimulus response (OSR) in isolated retinas subjected to periodic patterns of dark flashes, we develop a pharmacologically-based model which accounts for resonances in ON bipolar cells. The bipolar cell terminal contains an LRC oscillator whose inductance is modulated by a transient calcium concentration, thus adjusting its resonant frequency to approximately match that of the stimulus. The model reproduces ganglion cell outputs, which sum the ON and OFF bipolar pathways, and it responds to omitted flashes with approximately constant latencies, as observed experimentally.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, a recent model of time perception suggests that the interval between two successive sensory events may be represented as the state-dependent intrinsic patterns of sensory signals when intervals are less than a few hundred milliseconds, but not for longer intervals 3 4 . Finally, the event-related potentials to the omission of isochronous repetitive stimuli have different properties depending on the interstimulus intervals with the phase transition at 4–5 Hz 5 6 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Two different mechanisms for the detection of stimulus omission

Ohmae

Tanaka

2016

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although we can detect slight changes in musical rhythm, the underlying neural mechanism remains elusive. Here we show that two distinct mechanisms are automatically selected depending on the speed of the rhythm. When human subjects detected a single omission of isochronous repetitive auditory stimuli, reaction time strongly depended on the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) for shorter SOAs (<250 ms), but was almost constant for longer SOAs. For shorter SOAs, subjects were unable to detect stimulus omission when either monaural stimuli or those in different frequencies were randomly presented. In contrast, for longer SOAs, reaction time increased when different tempos were presented simultaneously to different ears. These results suggest that depending on the speed of rhythms, the brain may use either temporal grouping of discrete sounds or temporal prediction of upcoming stimuli to detect the absence of a regular stimulus. Because we also found a similar relationship between reaction time and SOA for both visual and tactile stimuli, dual detection strategies could be generalized to other sensory modalities.

show abstract

Dynamics of event-related potentials to trains of light and dark flashes: Responses to missing and extra stimuli in elasmobranch fish

Cited by 22 publications

References 8 publications

Human Auditory Fast and Slow Omitted Stimulus Potentials and Steady-State Responses

Human Auditory Fast and Slow Omitted Stimulus Potentials and Steady-State Responses

An oscillatory circuit underlying the detection of disruptions in temporally-periodic patterns

Two different mechanisms for the detection of stimulus omission

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About