Dynamics of inelastic base-isolated structures subjected to recorded ground motions

Summary This study develops a straightforward approximate method to estimate inelastic displacement ratio, C1 for base‐isolated structures subjected to near‐fault and far‐fault ground motions. Taking into account the inelastic behavior of isolator and superstructure, a 2 degrees of freedom model is employed. A total of 90 earthquake ground motions are selected and classified into different clusters according to the frequency content features of records represented by the peak ground acceleration to peak ground velocity ratio, Ap/Vp. A parametric study is conducted, and effective factors in C1 (i.e., fundamental vibration period of the superstructure, Ts; postyield stiffness ratio of the superstructure, αs; strength reduction ratio, R; vibration period of the isolator, Tb; strength of the isolator, Q; ratio of superstructure mass to total mass of the system, γm) are recognized. The results indicate that the practical range of C1 values could be expected for base‐isolated structures. Subsequently, effective parameters are included in simple predictive equations. Finally, the accuracy of the proposed approximate equations is evaluated and verified through error measurement, and comparisons are made in the analyses.

Section: Effective Parametersmentioning

confidence: 56%

Section: Effective Parametersmentioning

confidence: 99%

C_{1} = \frac{\frac{T_{b} + c_{Q}}{c_{α} T_{a}} ((), R - 1) + 1}{R} T_{s} > T_{a}

C_{1} = \frac{\frac{T_{b} + c_{Q}}{c_{α} T_{s}} ((), R - 1) + 1}{R} T_{a} < T_{s} < T_{c}

C_{1} = 1 T_{s} > T_{c}

Section: Previous C1 Equationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Previous C1 Equationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Estimation of inelastic displacement ratio for base‐isolated structures

Yaghmaei‐Sabegh

Safari

Ghayouri

2017

Simplified analysis of bilinear elastic systems exhibiting negative stiffness behavior

Manzo

Vassiliou

2020

Self Cite

This work studies the dynamics of the Negative Stiffness Bilinear Elastic (NSBE) oscillator. Such a mathematical idealization can be used to describe deformable rocking systems equipped with restraining tendons or with curved extensions of their bases. First, this paper establishes the characteristic quantities of the bilinear system to make it equivalent to the actual rocking structures. Then, it proceeds by proposing a simpler "equivalent" system that can be used to study the behavior of the NSBE. The equivalent system is not some linear elastic oscillator but a bilinear elastic system with zero stiffness of the second branch: the Zero Stiffness Bilinear Elastic (ZSBE) system. ZSBE is useful because it needs one parameter less than NSBE to be defined. Next, "Equal Displacement" and "Equal Energy" rules that provide estimates of the maximum displacement of the NSBE based on the response of the ZSBE are defined. The concept is similar to the RμΤ relations that provide estimates of the response of bilinear yielding systems based on the response of an equivalent linear elastic system, with one major difference: it does not resort to a linear elastic system but to the ZSBE. The proposed methodology is applied on the FEMA P695 ground motions scaled at three different levels. The results show that ZSBE is a good proxy of NSBE and, hence, indicate that an exhaustive study of the ZSBE is useful for the design of rocking structures.

Surrogate models for seismic response analysis of flexible rocking structures

Alvares da Silva,

Stojadinović

2024

Seismic design tools are based on surrogate models of the designed structure and the responses of those surrogates to earthquake ground motions. To design symmetric flexible rocking structures, a surrogate model that includes rocking and flexure is needed. In this paper, we derive the equation of motion of a flexible multi‐degree‐of‐freedom (MDOF) structure rocking on its base in modal coordinates. Then, we introduce a set of two‐degree‐of‐freedom (2DOF) surrogate models that accounts only for the first elastic vibration mode of the multimass structure and its rotation about the base pivot points. We investigate the surrogates' ability to represent the dynamics of an elastic MDOF structure that uplifts and rocks and the interaction between rocking and flexure. Therein, we detail the simplifications for the equations of motion of the 2DOF surrogate models and the adopted rocking impact model, and develop and check the sliding initiation condition. We show that the simplified 2DOF surrogate model responses compare well to experimental results. Then we assess the 2DOF surrogate model accuracy in representing the earthquake response of the MDOF model using Cloud Analysis and the coefficient of determination approach. We find that simplified 2DOF surrogate of the MDOF model is quite accurate () in estimating its maximum relative top displacement and acceptably accurate () in estimating its maximum base rotation based on a thousand randomly generated flexible rocking structure earthquake response analyses. Lastly, we discuss using the simplified 2DOF surrogate model of symmetric flexible rocking structures in preliminary seismic design, and give examples featuring a continuous elastic hollow semi‐conical chimney and an inelastic flexible MDOF structure, both with a base that may uplift.