Dynamics of interprofessional teamwork: Why three logics are better than one

Skyberg, Henriette Lund; Innvær, Simon

doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113472

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Interprofessional collaboration requires a high level of communication [37] hence the daily board meetings in FACT, where the team members can coordinate their work and share the patients' needs, wishes, and goals [27]. These meetings give the team members the opportunity to share the overall goals of treatment and the patients` wishes [14].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One team is debating whether they should prioritise therapy or recovery, this might indicate that they have not reached a consensus about how to work with the FACT models shared caseload. Perhaps they cannot integrate each other's different expertise [37] and combine that of the team members in a new organisational model [38], in which case, they might miss out on the benefit of a shared caseload. They could have achieved these aims by agreeing on who works with which of the patients' wishes and how.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A crucial factor in interprofessional collaboration is having a common aim in the team, which Allred, Burns, and Philips [17] describe as creating a shared understanding. If there is no common ground from which the team members interact, there can be a problem with integrating different professional perspectives [37]. Nevertheless, by focusing on a shared caseload and working accordingly, integrating each other's knowledge might be implemented more in the FACT teams' board meetings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings

Myraunet,

Strøm,

Gjersøe

2023

International Journal of Integrated Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:The Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model has rapidly become a way of organising services for people with severe mental illness. FACT describes the integrated approach of interprofessional teams.Method: A qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in three FACT teams was conducted. Thirty observations of the teams' board meetings were conducted, and field notes were thematically analysed.Results: This study generated three themes in interprofessional collaboration in FACT teams. The first theme reflects the challenges of working in line with the model, the second suggests an unclear understanding of a shared caseload, and the third shows different approaches to working with a shared caseload. Discussion:The themes suggest that there is increased opportunity for the shared caseload in the FACT team board meeting. The findings reflect that there is a lack of either the resources necessary for working with a shared caseload or an understanding of the intention of a shared caseload. Conclusion:The potential of the shared caseload in FACT team board meetings are dependent on sufficient resources and a collective understanding of the FACT model and the shared caseload among professionals. Further research on how a shared caseload is experienced and facilitated in FACT teams can provide insight into their practices.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings

Myraunet,

Strøm,

Gjersøe

2023

International Journal of Integrated Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…I denne artikkelen avgrenser vi oss til begrepet tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid. Begrepet favner ulike profesjoner som samarbeider om felles oppgaver, og innebaerer integrasjon av de ulike profesjonenes kunnskaper og ferdigheter i motsetning til klare skiller mellom de ulike profesjonenes roller eller at en profesjon overtar roller/ funksjoner fra en annen (Skyberg & Innvaer, 2020). Det dannes en form for «merviten» som går ut over den enkelte profesjons bidrag, utviklet gjennom diskusjoner og refleksjoner omkring de felles oppgavene (Willumsen, 2016, s. 39).…”

Section: Samarbeid Mellom Profesjoner Som Fenomenunclassified

Betydningen av tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid for lærernes vurderinger av egen kompetanse til å tilpasse opplæring i skolen

Saltkjel

Tøge

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Samarbeid med profesjoner i og rundt skolen er en forutsetning for at lærere skal kunne gi elevene tilpasset opplæring, men det er uklart hvor tydelig denne sammenhengen er. I denne artikkelen undersøker vi læreres vurderinger av kvalitet i tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid og av deres forventninger om å mestre tilpasset opplæring. Videre undersøkes hvorvidt og i hvilken grad det er sammenheng mellom deres vurderinger av kvaliteten i tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid og deres forventninger om å mestre tilpasset opplæring. Dataene er hentet fra en spørreundersøkelse til 225 kontaktlærere på 5.–7. trinn i 37 barneskoler i fire kommuner i Norge i 2017. Svarprosenten på undersøkelsen var 69,8 prosent. Resultatene fra den lineære regresjonsanalysen viser at læreres vurdering av kvaliteten i tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid i liten grad forklarer deres forventninger om å mestre tilpasset opplæring. Av de ulike dimensjonene av tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid; tverrprofesjonelt klima og kultur, profesjonell makt, organisasjonsmål og ledelse og motivasjon, er det kun for organisasjonsmål der sammenhengen med tilpasset opplæring er signifikant. Imidlertid kan kollektiv mestringsforventning bidra til at lærerne opplever å kunne gi tilpasset opplæring. Kollektiv mestringsforventning er skolens og lærerkollegiets støtte og kompetanse i å håndtere utfordrende elevsituasjoner. Resultatene tyder på at skolekollektivet og samarbeid med andre lærere er viktig for lærernes vurderinger av egen kompetanse til å tilpasse opplæringen, nettopp fordi lærerne er mest opptatt av sin kjerneaktivitet – undervisning.

show abstract

“…The nurses perform all those tasks together with the team, so it needs teamwork and discussion among team members. (Skyberg & Innvaer, 2020) The teamwork system is needed to create a balanced division of tasks, role, responsibility, and general purpose. (Mendo-Lázaro et al, 2018) The communication ability and social relationship are also required in teamwork, so the health service system can be more complex with patient-centered care (Mendo-Lázaro et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Success of Nursing Team Cooperation in Nursing Care during Pandemic: A Scoping Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The nursing care success was depended on teamwork quality and The pandemic situation could affect the increase of nurse workload in performing nursing intervention. Objective: Aimed to identify the factors that could affect nursing team cooperation success in performing nursing care. Method: The scoping review research was conducted through article identification from four databases such as ScienceDirect, ProQuest, EBSCO, and PubMed in 2019-2021 according to PRISMA-ScR. Search article by using these following keyword combinations: "teamwork OR nursing work OR partnership OR nursing team AND nursing care AND pandemic of COVID-19" to collect related articles. Results: Based on the result of 815 scientific article analysis, about 15 full text articles were in accordance with inclusion criteria for the research review. The internal factors which affected teamwork success in nursing care were consisted of human resource, physical condition, and psychological aspect. Meanwhile, the external factors were consisted of communication, work environment, workload, policy, and documentation. Conclusions: The internal and external factors could be used as a base to identify positive and negative aspects that might affect the success of nursing team performance in carrying out nursing care.

show abstract

Dynamics of interprofessional teamwork: Why three logics are better than one

Cited by 7 publications

References 23 publications

From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings

From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings

Betydningen av tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid for lærernes vurderinger av egen kompetanse til å tilpasse opplæring i skolen

The Success of Nursing Team Cooperation in Nursing Care during Pandemic: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About