1956
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.101.922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Ionized Media

Abstract: The behavior of an ionized plasma is discussed in an approximation in which an individual particle is assumed to obey a Fokker-Planck equation, and where its interaction with the environment is incorporated in the coefficients of the partial differential equation. It is found that if the interaction of the test particle with the medium is divided into a "nearest neighbor" interaction (which manifests itself in "large-angle collisions") and an interaction with the rest of the medium, then the latter can be adeq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faster particles show reduced, asymmetric screening, for which an analytic solution cannot be obtained, but numerical solutions have been published by a number of authors (Wang et al 1981, Decyk 1987, Ellis et al 2011. Several authors have used the Holtsmark distribution for the distant interactions (Chandrasekhar et al 1943, Gasiorowicz et al 1956), which describes the electric field due to a completely random distribution of stationary point charges. This diverges, so an upper cut-off has to be introduced.…”
Section: Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faster particles show reduced, asymmetric screening, for which an analytic solution cannot be obtained, but numerical solutions have been published by a number of authors (Wang et al 1981, Decyk 1987, Ellis et al 2011. Several authors have used the Holtsmark distribution for the distant interactions (Chandrasekhar et al 1943, Gasiorowicz et al 1956), which describes the electric field due to a completely random distribution of stationary point charges. This diverges, so an upper cut-off has to be introduced.…”
Section: Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each theory has a difficulty in describing the scales of the order of d. The mean-field approach cannot describe the graininess of these scales, and the Rutherford picture cannot describe the simultaneous "collisions" with several particles. Even for scales smaller than d, the Rutherford collision is modified due to the fluctuating electric field of the other particles in the Debye sphere [73]. Using the more relevant description for scales smaller than d [110] and the one for the larger scales [73], the corresponding contributions to transport turn out to be of the same order of magnitude.…”
Section: A Limited Capabilities Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Using the more relevant description for scales smaller than d [110] and the one for the larger scales [73], the corresponding contributions to transport turn out to be of the same order of magnitude. Furthermore, if one accepts to cross the "validity border" d, and one performs the final integration on the whole range of scales [λ ma , λ D ] for either theory, the two results are found to agree [73,110].…”
Section: A Limited Capabilities Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chandrasekhar (1942Chandrasekhar ( , 1943a derived a Fokker-Planck equation by considering gravitational encounters in an infinite homogeneous system of stars. The derivation of the diffusion and friction coefficients was simplified by Cohen, Spitzer & Routly (1950); Gasiorowicz, Neuman & Riddell (1956) ;Rosenbluth, MacDonald & Judd (1957). The general kinetic equation for inhomogeneous stellar systems was derived by Gilbert (1968); this is rigorous and based on a systematic 1/N expansion of the BBGKY (Bogoliubov, Born, Green, Kirkwood, Yvon) equations of non-equilibrium statistical mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%