1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00692293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Mars-orbiting dust: Effects of light pressure and planetary oblateness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the planar evolution of swarm members perturbed by the Earth's oblateness and solar radiation pressure (SRP) with the obliquity of the ecliptic ignored, another family of precessing elliptical orbits can be found, where the full orbital dynamics defined by ex=ecos and ey=esin, are given by the following [18][19][20][21]  (13) where e is the actual eccentricity, Sun n is the angular rate of the Earth around the Sun, and  is the actual pericentre angle between the Sun-Earth line and the pericentre of the elliptical orbit shown in Fig.3. Compared with Kozai's model [22] including only SRP and without the J2 perturbation, the planar model used in this section includes both the SRP and J2…”
Section: B Precessing Elliptical Orbit Perturbed By J2 and Srpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the planar evolution of swarm members perturbed by the Earth's oblateness and solar radiation pressure (SRP) with the obliquity of the ecliptic ignored, another family of precessing elliptical orbits can be found, where the full orbital dynamics defined by ex=ecos and ey=esin, are given by the following [18][19][20][21]  (13) where e is the actual eccentricity, Sun n is the angular rate of the Earth around the Sun, and  is the actual pericentre angle between the Sun-Earth line and the pericentre of the elliptical orbit shown in Fig.3. Compared with Kozai's model [22] including only SRP and without the J2 perturbation, the planar model used in this section includes both the SRP and J2…”
Section: B Precessing Elliptical Orbit Perturbed By J2 and Srpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is easy to solve for ex and ey from the above equation as (20) where e and  are referred as the mean eccentricity and the mean angle related to the pericentre. e stays invariant which can be used to parameterize different families of (ex, ey), and t…”
Section: B Precessing Elliptical Orbit Perturbed By J2 and Srpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, extending the above calculation for all the major couples of primaries of the Solar System, the two Martian moons have the highest values of transition grain radius on the mean surface among the bodies considered. This means that Phobos and Deimos could experience rings of dust clouds of micrometer scale around them (Krikov et al 1996) and some authors theorize that dust dynamics on the surface is responsible for the origin of the grooves of Phobos (Ramsley and Head III 2013a,b;Dombard et al 2010). We suggest that the footprint of IMs and large LPOs could have originated in the past the craters and the grooves of Phobos, and that current dust clouds of grain dimension over 20µm could correspond to the LPOs presented in this paper.…”
Section: Extension Of the Lpos And Ims To Model Natural Impacts On Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secular and long-period rate of change of the orbital elements due to solar radiation pressure (SRP) and J 2 are given for example in (Krivov et al, 1995) and were implemented in PlanODyn (Colombo et al, 2012) as:…”
Section: Averaged Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar radiation pressure and planetary oblateness are essential to predict the motion of impact ejecta from Phobos and Deimos in orbits around Mars (Krivov et al, 1995) or high area-to-mass spacecraft around the Earth (Colombo et al, 2012). Similarly, the environment models used for space debris evolution implement the e↵ect of solar radiation pressure, third body perturbations of Sun and Moon, and the e↵ect of the Earth's oblateness (Rossi et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%