2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-018-9838-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of mirror writing compared to conventional writing in typical preliterate children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, Corballis' suggestion that “early processing retains left-right information for perception, but this is lost at the later stage where recognition takes place” (p. 4) is opportune. Furthermore, his theory's proposition that both hemispheres contain both veridical and reversed representations is compatible with character reversal in writing from memory as a function of a character's orientation, as observed by our research group and by Portex et al ( 2018 ), McIntosh et al ( 2018a , b ), and Treiman et al ( 2014 ). However, it does not exclude other explanations.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…To conclude, Corballis' suggestion that “early processing retains left-right information for perception, but this is lost at the later stage where recognition takes place” (p. 4) is opportune. Furthermore, his theory's proposition that both hemispheres contain both veridical and reversed representations is compatible with character reversal in writing from memory as a function of a character's orientation, as observed by our research group and by Portex et al ( 2018 ), McIntosh et al ( 2018a , b ), and Treiman et al ( 2014 ). However, it does not exclude other explanations.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Because these wide-ranging data come from the same laboratory, it is important to mention that many other recent and independent findings are consistent with the relative frequency of the character's reversal suggested by the data. Thus, even if this other research was not aimed at establishing the frequency of reversal of the characters, one can note that (1) a study on 44 Scottish children (M age = 6.82, from 4.6 to 10.3) who wrote the uppercase letters found that the likelihood of reversal for J and Z was elevated both in writing with the dominant and non-dominant hands [40]; (2) A training study on 30 French children (M age = 4.63, from 4.25 to 5) found more than 50% reversals for 1, 3, J, and Z, and less than 10% for B, E, N, R and S, which were the only asymmetrical characters studied [41].…”
Section: Children Reverse the Different Characters Frequently But Unementioning
confidence: 97%
“…One way to do this would be to compare mirror reversals in cultures with different writing directions, but this is not easy to do for a number of reasons (e.g., the characters may be different). Consequently, many researches [35,37,[41][42][43] applied a technique devised in [45] to observe spontaneous mirror writing of their name (or words) by young children. The technique consists of asking children to write their name on sheets of paper bisected by a vertical line, and to start writing at a dot near the bisecting line, sometimes to the left of the line and sometimes to the right.…”
Section: Children Reverse Right-oriented Letters When Writing From Rimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations