2003
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of solar coronal loops

Abstract: Abstract.We report numerical calculations of the condensation of plasma in short coronal loops, which have several interesting physical consequences. Firstly, we propose a connection between small, cool loops (T < 10 6 K), which constitute one of the basic components of the solar transition region, and prominences, in the sense that the same physical mechanism governs their dynamics: Namely the onset of instability and runaway cooling due to strong radiative losses. Secondly, we show that the temporal evolutio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

22
176
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
22
176
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this late phase the dominant heating of the apex is due to heat conduction from the sides. Potentially, such situations can lead to a loss of equilibrium and catastrophic cooling (Müller et al 2003(Müller et al , 2004), which we do not observe here because the heating is not concentrated strongly enough towards the footpoints. In 3D models with a more stable magnetic field configuration, the loop can reach a (quasi-)equilibrium state, and remain stable for a longer time (Peter & Bingert 2012).…”
Section: Cooling Phasementioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this late phase the dominant heating of the apex is due to heat conduction from the sides. Potentially, such situations can lead to a loss of equilibrium and catastrophic cooling (Müller et al 2003(Müller et al , 2004), which we do not observe here because the heating is not concentrated strongly enough towards the footpoints. In 3D models with a more stable magnetic field configuration, the loop can reach a (quasi-)equilibrium state, and remain stable for a longer time (Peter & Bingert 2012).…”
Section: Cooling Phasementioning
confidence: 73%
“…While now time-dependent models including plasma flows are widely used, they mostly concentrate on the loop evolution in a magnetic field that changes only slightly or not at all (see, e.g., review by Reale 2010). This applies to 1D models for the dynamic evolution of loops, for example, accounting for siphon flows (Boris & Mariska 1982), in response to intermittent nanoflare heating (Hansteen 1993), or concerning catastrophic cooling (Müller et al 2003). In addition, 3D models of the coronal loop structure considered either a constant or slowly changing magnetic field in the photosphere (Gudiksen & Nordlund 2002;Bingert & Peter 2011;Lionello et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat conductivity according to Spitzer [23], q ∝ T 5/2 ∇T, is very sensitive to the temperature T. Known at least since the first one-dimensional coronal models including the transition region [24][25][26], as a consequence of the heat conductivity in the transition region the temperature gradient becomes very steep, which requires a very small grid spacing. In more recent models, the grid spacing is as small as 1 km [27] or even smaller when an adaptive grid is used [28,29]. As pointed out early in [30,31], other (turbulence) processes might take over well before such small scales for the temperature gradients are reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the width of the line in Hα as a proxy, Antolin and Rouppe van der Voort (2012) give upper limits for Hα coronal rain centered around 7000 K but with a long tail to higher temperatures up to 5 × 10 4 K. It has not been possible to measure densities directly so far, but estimates are made based on numerical simulations of the phenomenon (Müller, Hansteen, and Peter 2003;Müller, Peter, and Hansteen 2004;Tsiklauri et al 2004;Mendoza-Briceño, Sigalotti, and Erdélyi 2005;Mok et al 2008;Antolin, Shibata, and Vissers 1 Most of these observations are done with imaging instruments and thus the speeds correspond to projected values in the plane of the sky. However, since all reports correspond to off-limb observations, the values are close to the total velocities, as confirmed by the spectropolarimetric observations in Antolin and Rouppe van der Voort (2012). 2010; Murawski, Zaqarashvili, and Nakariakov 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%