2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of spray and swirling flame under acoustic oscillations : A joint experimental and LES investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for the smaller recess distance are not shown here and are to be presented in a future article. The weak equivalence ratio fluctuation observed in the present case is also demonstrated through numerical simulations performed with a similar injector geometry in [57]. One may therefore assume for the present spray flame case, as for the premixed flames, that the light intensity of OH * is indicative of the heat release rate integrated over the flame volume Q.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The results for the smaller recess distance are not shown here and are to be presented in a future article. The weak equivalence ratio fluctuation observed in the present case is also demonstrated through numerical simulations performed with a similar injector geometry in [57]. One may therefore assume for the present spray flame case, as for the premixed flames, that the light intensity of OH * is indicative of the heat release rate integrated over the flame volume Q.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In an experimental investigation of a premixed prevaporized combustor fed with heptane, Bernier et al [20] found that the evaporation delay happens simultaneously with droplet convection to the combustion region so that this delay need not be added to the other delays in the analysis of the causes of combustion instability. Vignat et al [9] used an LES to study a self-sustained combustion oscillation in a single injector test rig, namely SICCA-Spray, and reached a similar conclusion. However, this might not apply to fuels that are less volatile than heptane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These engines when operated with liquid fuels, use spray atomizers. The spray can be strongly influenced by the acoustic pressure oscillations in the chamber, even if the high atomizing pressure ensures a constant flow rate in many configurations [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Finally, the same authors performed previous LES studies of the same system [28,29] revealing the coupling mechanism between the acoustic mode and the liquid film forming on the injector walls to be fundamental to trigger and sustain the thermoacoustic limit cycle. This conclusion however questions the impact of an injection angle variation which is expected to modify the liquid film and therefore its coupling with the thermoacoustic mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, it is worth mentioning that, following previous works on the same configuration [28,29], the droplet size distribution is imposed via a Rosin-Rammler probability density function (PDF) fitted from experimental measurements of mean (D 10 ) and Sauter diameters (SMD or D 32 ) taken at z = 2.5 mm in the combustion chamber: D 10 = 10 µm and D 32 = 18 µm. Since the primary objective is to investigate only the effect of the spray angle, changes in terms of droplet diameter are only due to evaporation, neglecting phenomena like primary and secondary atomization as well as splash and liquid film break-up at the edge of the injector wall.…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%