2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of steps along a martensitic phase boundary I: Semi-analytical solution

Abstract: We study the motion of steps along a martensitic phase boundary in a cubic lattice. To enable analytical calculations, we assume antiplane shear deformation and consider a phase transforming material with a stress-strain law that is piecewise linear with respect to one component of shear strain and linear with respect to another. Under these assumptions we derive a semi-analytical solution describing a steady sequential motion of the steps under an external loading. Our analysis yields kinetic relations betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests non-existence of traveling wave solutions with velocity lower than the threshold value in the z = 0 case, in agreement with the conjectures made in [13, 16]. Meanwhile, solutions at sufficiently high velocities ( V ≥ V h ≈ 0.9908 at χ = 1) are also inadmissible, because the large amplitude of waves propagating behind the step front causes the n = 2 bonds directly above the step to switch from variant I to variant II, which violates the first inequality in (30) (see also [8]).…”
Section: Admissible Solutions and Kinetic Relationssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests non-existence of traveling wave solutions with velocity lower than the threshold value in the z = 0 case, in agreement with the conjectures made in [13, 16]. Meanwhile, solutions at sufficiently high velocities ( V ≥ V h ≈ 0.9908 at χ = 1) are also inadmissible, because the large amplitude of waves propagating behind the step front causes the n = 2 bonds directly above the step to switch from variant I to variant II, which violates the first inequality in (30) (see also [8]).…”
Section: Admissible Solutions and Kinetic Relationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We remark that the kinetic relations obtained here are in general quantitatively different from the ones obtained in [23, 27] for the closely related one-dimensional FK model due to the different kernel (23) in the integral equation (25). In particular, the amplitude of the oscillations in our kernel decays at infinity [8], while in the one-dimensional case it remains constant. Note also that the one-dimensional problem has stronger singularities at the resonance velocities in the z = 0 case [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations