2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2006.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of the excitation and upconversion processes in YAlO3: Pr single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 shows the luminescence decay curve of the 1 D 2 → 3 F 4 transition, and lifetime measurements show a single exponential for 1 D 2 level too. This suggests that no energy transfer processes involving the 1 D 2 level are present in this system and the mean value of the fluorescence lifetime was estimated to be 92.88 s, which can be compared with Pr 3+ :YAP: 28 s [22]. The quantum efficiency was calculated to be 93.39% according the equation Á = f / r for the 1 D 2 → 3 F 4 transition, which is higher than Pr 3+ :YAG: 90% [16].…”
Section: Fluorescence Lifetimes and Quantum Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…7 shows the luminescence decay curve of the 1 D 2 → 3 F 4 transition, and lifetime measurements show a single exponential for 1 D 2 level too. This suggests that no energy transfer processes involving the 1 D 2 level are present in this system and the mean value of the fluorescence lifetime was estimated to be 92.88 s, which can be compared with Pr 3+ :YAP: 28 s [22]. The quantum efficiency was calculated to be 93.39% according the equation Á = f / r for the 1 D 2 → 3 F 4 transition, which is higher than Pr 3+ :YAG: 90% [16].…”
Section: Fluorescence Lifetimes and Quantum Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For the samples containing 0.2% Pr 3 + some residual slow defect-related intrinsic emission at 380 nm is present. The lines around 610 nm are assigned to the 1 D 2 -3 H 4 radiative transition within the 4f 2 configuration; the relative intensity of the 5d-4f transitions with respect to the 4f-4f ones increases with the Pr 3 + concentration, as the 1 D 2 emission is significantly affected by concentration quenching due to cross-relaxation [16].…”
Section: Vuv Synchrotron Radiation Excited Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…And the lifetime 3 P 0 → 3 H 6 transition was fitted to be 21.0 s, which 44]. By following the calculation equation of quantum efficiency Á = f / r , we can obtain the quantum efficiencies of 3 P 0 → 3 H 6 transitions to be 29.6%, which can be compared with the quantum efficiencies of 1% Pr:YAG (82.3% [37]) and 1% YAP (70% [43]). The relatively low quantum efficiency of this transition might be due to the static perturbations of the crystal fields led by Gd 3+ in octahedral a sites being a non-stoichiometric defect [21].…”
Section: Fluorescence Lifetimes and Quantum Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the lifetime the 1 D 2 manifold is estimated to be 118.4 s by using = (B 1 1 2 + B 2 2 2 )/(B 1 1 + B 2 2 ) [29], which is much longer than that of 3 P 0 level. The experimental lifetime value of the 1 D 2 level can be compared to that of 1 mol%Pr:GGG nanocrystalline: 110s [25], 0.5% Pr 3+ :YAG: 110s [45] and of 1% Pr 3+ :YAP: 28s [43]. It is interesting to point that at 4 K the decay 1 D 2 → 3 H 4 profile of Pr:GGG is exponential with a lifetime of 260 s [23], as in contrast with the above results of this job.…”
Section: Fluorescence Lifetimes and Quantum Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%