2013
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/1/55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of tissue shrinkage during ablative temperature exposures

Abstract: There is a lack of studies that examine dynamics of heat-induced shrinkage of organ tissues. Clinical procedures such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation or high-intensity focused ultrasound, use heat to treat diseases such as cancer and cardiac arrhythmia. When heat is applied to tissues, shrinkage occurs due to protein denaturation, dehydration, and contraction of collagen at temperatures greater 50ºC. This is particularly relevant for image-guided procedures such as tumor ablation, where pre- and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
12
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, shrinkage of the ablated tissue volume has been reported in clinical practice and in experimental investigation of MW, and to a lesser extent in RF heating [13][14][15][16]. Looking at the spatial and temporal tissue contraction via CT scans performed during a MW ablation procedure, significant shrinkage was observed during the first minutes of heating [13,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, shrinkage of the ablated tissue volume has been reported in clinical practice and in experimental investigation of MW, and to a lesser extent in RF heating [13][14][15][16]. Looking at the spatial and temporal tissue contraction via CT scans performed during a MW ablation procedure, significant shrinkage was observed during the first minutes of heating [13,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the spatial and temporal tissue contraction via CT scans performed during a MW ablation procedure, significant shrinkage was observed during the first minutes of heating [13,16]. Moreover, expansion of the tissue was also noticed in some samples [14,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tissue carbonisation is not, therefore, an insurmountable barrier to the MW heating process, and temperatures far higher than 100 ℃ may be reached within the target tumor, allowing enhanced active and passive tissue heating, larger coagulation zones and more effective rejection of heat sinking effects [32,33] . When high power MWA treatments are performed, several qualitative and quantitative differences are observed in terms of RFA: (1) the hyper-echogenic spot around the probe-active tip detectable on ultrasound-scanning during a thermal ablation procedure forms and expands at a much higher rate, providing a visual feedback of the ongoing vaporization process; (2) post-MWA follow-up scans [either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] usually show, in the region surrounding what was the probe active tip position during the ablation, an inner hyper-dense core contrasting with an outer thicker and hypo-dense annulus, the former being charred tissue (not present on RFA) and the latter being the coagulated but not carbonized zone typical of any thermal ablation modality ( Figures 1 and 2); and (3) due to massive water evaporation, MWA treatments induce substantial contraction in target tissues (30%-70% in volume, according to several ex-vivo and in vivo experimental observations [34][35][36] ), far more than their RFA counterparts [37] . If the appropriate shrinkage correction factor is used for accurately calculating the actual ablation volume, the coagulative performance gap between MWA and RFA widens further.…”
Section: Physical Differences Between Rfa and Mwamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Two of them are purely theoretical [63,98] and one has been compared only with microwave ablation [103]. Research into quantification of temperature and time-dependent tissue shrinkage due to evaporation has only just started [105,106] and will be valuable for future modelling.…”
Section: Fem Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%