2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3207641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Voluntary Disclosure in the Unregulated Market for Initial Coin Offerings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ICOs are a fundraising mechanism in which a new token is sold to investors and prospective returns, see Benedetti and Kostovetsky (2018), Chanson et al (2018), Dittmar and Wu (2018), Drobetz et al (2018), Hu et al (2018), Lu (2018), Momtaz (2018a), Stastny (2018), Yuryev (2018), and Stanley (2019). On the amount raised, including failure to meet a set target, see Adhami et al (2018), , Ante et al (2018), Blaseg (2018), Burns and Moro (2018), Davydiuk et al (2018), Feng et al (2018), Fenu et al (2018), Fisch (2018), , Momtaz (2018b), Momtaz (2018c), Rhue (2018b), Albrecht et al (2019), Ante and Fiedler (2019), Cai and Gomaa (2019), Cerchiello et al (2019), Chen (2019), Johnson and Yi (2019), Masiak et al (2019), Philippi et al (2019), and Wu et al (2019). On liquidity see Bourveau et al (2018), Lyandres et al (2018), and Fisch and Momtaz (2019).…”
Section: The Ico Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICOs are a fundraising mechanism in which a new token is sold to investors and prospective returns, see Benedetti and Kostovetsky (2018), Chanson et al (2018), Dittmar and Wu (2018), Drobetz et al (2018), Hu et al (2018), Lu (2018), Momtaz (2018a), Stastny (2018), Yuryev (2018), and Stanley (2019). On the amount raised, including failure to meet a set target, see Adhami et al (2018), , Ante et al (2018), Blaseg (2018), Burns and Moro (2018), Davydiuk et al (2018), Feng et al (2018), Fenu et al (2018), Fisch (2018), , Momtaz (2018b), Momtaz (2018c), Rhue (2018b), Albrecht et al (2019), Ante and Fiedler (2019), Cai and Gomaa (2019), Cerchiello et al (2019), Chen (2019), Johnson and Yi (2019), Masiak et al (2019), Philippi et al (2019), and Wu et al (2019). On liquidity see Bourveau et al (2018), Lyandres et al (2018), and Fisch and Momtaz (2019).…”
Section: The Ico Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using CEO's cumulative tenure on previous jobs as a measure of loyalty, Momtaz (2018a) shows that CEO's loyalty is negatively associated with ICOs underpricing and positively related to firm's long-run success. On disclosure quality, Blaseg (2018) finds that young ventures that disclose higher quality source codes are more likely to list on a public exchange shortly after ICOs. While insightful, this literature has not evaluated founders' characteristics, individually and collectively, in a systematic way.…”
Section: Initial Coin Offerings and Entrepreneurial Finance: The Rolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Momtaz (2018a, c) examines how CEO's emotion and loyalty shape a successful ICO. Blaseg (2018) investigates whether the disclosure of high-quality source code increases the probability of listing on a public exchange following a token sale. Howell, Niessner, and Yermack (2018) show that the liquidity and trading volume are higher following an ICO when issuers signal high project quality and commitment to the project.…”
Section: Summary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhami et al (2018) collected very basic data on a sample of ICOs which mostly ran in 2017. Fisch (2019), Amsden and Schweizer (2018), Blaseg (2018) and Cerchiello et al (2019) use more recent samples and attempt to identify the success factors behind ICOs by looking at the funds raised and token listing status. Adhami and Giudici (2019) study the effect of the governance signals of ICO-backed projects such as token rights, institutional setting and team quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%