2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42464-021-00120-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of water-use efficiency and status in promising Hevea brasiliensis genotypes: implications for clonal selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the rainy period, the stomatal conductance was high in most genotypes, allowing a greater fixation of CO 2 that translated into a maximum use of soil water for transpiration, which was expressed by a lower WUE, results that coincide with that reported by Blum et al [44], but contradict other studies that have indicated greater photosynthesis in the dry period of the Amazon region [13,45,46]. This reflects contrasting photosynthetic responses at the intra-specific level of H. brasiliensis, in which some genotypes require greater water availability to maintain high photosynthetic rates; others are more efficient at using water to maintain these rates, and others are affected in terms of their efficiencies, photosynthesis and water status under drought conditions [11,19,20]. In this study, in both environments (semi-humid warm and humid warm), the dry period and range between 9:00 and 12:00 h saw 60-70% of the genotypes with minimal reductions (<30%) in photosynthetic rates while others (30-40%) had moderate increases in photosynthesis (>20%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the rainy period, the stomatal conductance was high in most genotypes, allowing a greater fixation of CO 2 that translated into a maximum use of soil water for transpiration, which was expressed by a lower WUE, results that coincide with that reported by Blum et al [44], but contradict other studies that have indicated greater photosynthesis in the dry period of the Amazon region [13,45,46]. This reflects contrasting photosynthetic responses at the intra-specific level of H. brasiliensis, in which some genotypes require greater water availability to maintain high photosynthetic rates; others are more efficient at using water to maintain these rates, and others are affected in terms of their efficiencies, photosynthesis and water status under drought conditions [11,19,20]. In this study, in both environments (semi-humid warm and humid warm), the dry period and range between 9:00 and 12:00 h saw 60-70% of the genotypes with minimal reductions (<30%) in photosynthetic rates while others (30-40%) had moderate increases in photosynthesis (>20%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Similarly, increases in VPD and AT that directly affect the photosynthetic rate by reducing the supply of CO 2 to rubisco as a result of a decrease in g s and Ci in the dry period [41,42], are more evident in young plants than adults since they do not have a sufficient volume of roots that would facilitate better use of the water available in deep levels of the soil [43]. However, in this study, the young individuals (two years old) of the Colombian genotypes had more efficient use of water and avoided important reductions in the leaf water potential during the dry period between 9:00 and 12:00 h, as compared with some 9-year-old introduced genotypes evaluated in the same environments, which had reductions in Ψ L above 50% [20], and decreases in the photosynthetic rate, between 30 and 40% [13] as compared to Colombian genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations