2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019jb017304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics, Radiation, and Overall Energy Budget of Earthquake Rupture With Coseismic Off‐Fault Damage

Abstract: Earthquake ruptures dynamically activate coseismic off-fault damage around fault cores.Systematic field observation efforts have shown the distribution of off-fault damage around main faults, while numerical modeling using elastic-plastic off-fault material models have demonstrated the evolution of coseismic off-fault damage during earthquake ruptures. Laboratory-scale microearthquake experiments have pointed out the enhanced high-frequency radiation due to the coseismic off-fault damage. However, the detailed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
129
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
13
129
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with seismological observations of mega-thrust subduction earthquakes where zones of highfrequency energy release correspond to deeper portions of the fault (Ishii, 2011). First, the increase of stress concentrations in the process zone with stress conditions and rupture velocity would likely enhance physical processes as off-fault damage (Okubo et al, 2018;Thomas et al, 2017;Thomas & Bhat, 2018) taking place in the vicinity of the rupture front leading to more radiated high-frequency energy. First, the increase of stress concentrations in the process zone with stress conditions and rupture velocity would likely enhance physical processes as off-fault damage (Okubo et al, 2018;Thomas et al, 2017;Thomas & Bhat, 2018) taking place in the vicinity of the rupture front leading to more radiated high-frequency energy.…”
Section: High-frequency Radiation Is Related To Stress and Rupture Vesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with seismological observations of mega-thrust subduction earthquakes where zones of highfrequency energy release correspond to deeper portions of the fault (Ishii, 2011). First, the increase of stress concentrations in the process zone with stress conditions and rupture velocity would likely enhance physical processes as off-fault damage (Okubo et al, 2018;Thomas et al, 2017;Thomas & Bhat, 2018) taking place in the vicinity of the rupture front leading to more radiated high-frequency energy. First, the increase of stress concentrations in the process zone with stress conditions and rupture velocity would likely enhance physical processes as off-fault damage (Okubo et al, 2018;Thomas et al, 2017;Thomas & Bhat, 2018) taking place in the vicinity of the rupture front leading to more radiated high-frequency energy.…”
Section: High-frequency Radiation Is Related To Stress and Rupture Vesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We carefully ensured that the back-projection results are reliable and are not manifestations of system noise (see supporting information for details). Recent numerical studies (Okubo et al, 2018;Thomas et al, 2017;Thomas & Bhat, 2018) also demonstrated that high-frequency radiation was highly enhanced when coseismic damage was implemented in their rupture propagation models. The correlation between the spatial and temporal evolution of high-frequency sources and the propagation of the rupture front provides concrete experimental evidence that highfrequency waves are concurrent with the propagation phase of the rupture front and that high-frequency radiation is emitted close to or behind the rupture tip.…”
Section: Back-projection At Laboratory Scale Provides New Insights Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Field observations (Austrheim et al, ; Petley‐Ragan et al, ; Rempe et al, ) and laboratory measurements (Incel, ; Yuan et al, ) demonstrate that the width of wall rock damage and pulverization (fragmentation with negligible strain) zones become increasingly narrow with increasing depth/pressure. This observation has also been confirmed by models showing the dependence of coseismic off‐fault damage with depth (Okubo et al, ). Near the Earth's surface (e.g., across the San Andreas fault; Rempe et al, ) the damage zone may reach exceed 100 m, with a pulverization threshold at around 50 m from the fault core.…”
Section: Dynamic Rupture and Damage In The Deep Crustsupporting
confidence: 66%