Dynamika działania procesów uwagi i hamowania w obecności bodźców dystrakcyjnych u dzieci z zespołem nadpobudliwości psychoruchowej z deficytem uwagi, autyzmem wysokofunkcjonującym i zaburzeniem opozycyjno-buntowniczym

Borkowska, Aneta R.

doi:10.15557/pipk.2016.0010

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Correspondingly, timeliness was the only MOXO-d-CPT index in which the ADHD patients significantly differed from healthy controls in Study 1 (differences approached significance in Study 2; p =.058). These findings correspond with the excellent discrimination capacity of the index among children in most (Berger & Goldzweig, 2010; Berger et al, 2013; Berger, Slobodin, & Cassuto, 2017; Slobodin, Cassuto, & Berger, 2018), though not all studies (A. R. Borkowska, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 60%

“…Further research, however, is needed as the attention index had stronger discriminative capacity than both the impulsivity and hyperactivity indices in Study 2. Furthermore, the findings of Berger et al (2013) suggest that the developmental patterns do not change for inattentiveness versus hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms, at least when assessed using the MOXO-d-CPT and up to the age of 11 (see also Berger et al, 2017; A. R. Borkowska, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Detection of Feigned ADHD Using the MOXO-d-CPT

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the MOXO-d-CPT utility in detecting feigned ADHD and establish cutoffs with adequate specificity and sensitivity. Method: The study had two phases. First, using a prospective design, healthy adults who simulated ADHD were compared with healthy controls and ADHD patients who performed the tasks to the best of their ability ( n = 47 per group). Participants performed the MOXO-d-CPT and an established performance validity test (PVT). Second, the MOXO-d-CPT classification accuracy, employed in Phase 1, was retrospectively compared with archival data of 47 ADHD patients and age-matched healthy controls. Results: Simulators performed significantly worse on all MOXO-d-CPT indices than healthy controls and ADHD patients. Three MOXO-d-CPT indices (attention, hyperactivity, impulsivity) and a scale combining these indices showed adequate discriminative capacity. Conclusion: The MOXO-d-CPT showed promise for the detection of feigned ADHD and, pending replication, can be employed for this aim in clinical practice and ADHD research.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 60%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detection of Feigned ADHD Using the MOXO-d-CPT

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such a result is in line with the literature showing that hyperactivity is a specific factor characterizing ADHD, more than inattention and impulsivity, at least in young children (Bramham et al, 2012;Halperin et al, 1992). In this vein and in line with previous findings, hyperactivity emerges as the index that most differentiates the two groups in all phases of the task (Borkowska, 2016), but even more when the impact of fatigue is considered. In addition, hyperactive symptoms generally tend to reduce with increasing age, while attention deficits are more persistent.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Uno et al (2006) found that, in children with ADHD, inattention, and hyperactivity were reduced by auditory distractors more than in the control group, while visual distractors only reduced inattention, having no impact on inhibitory control. Borkowska (2016), using MOXO d-CPT, found different results, as children with ADHD showed an increase in impulsive responses with distracting visual stimuli, alone or combined with auditory distractors, while hyperactive responses were not significantly affected by the modality of the distractors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Impact of Distractors on Sustained Attention and Inhibition in Children With ADHD

Rivella,

Bazzurro,

Olla

et al. 2024

J Atten Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study examines the impact of visual and auditory distractors on attention and inhibition in children with and without ADHD. Method: The study used the MOXO d-CPT child version. The sample consisted of 208 children aged 8 to 12 years, including 64 with ADHD and 144 controls. Results: Children with ADHD and controls differed in their reaction to distracting stimuli; visual distractors cause a higher decrease in sustained attention and inhibitory control in the ADHD group. Moreover, auditory distractors generate improved performance in the control group but not in the ADHD group. In addition, age-related effects were found in both sustained attention and inhibitory control in all children, regardless of whether the ADHD condition was present. Conclusions: The findings indicate that children with ADHD performed poorer compared to controls, and that distractors differently affected the performance of the two groups.

show abstract

“…In conditions requiring reflection on their behavior, children with ADHD show less incisiveness, do not give themselves internalized instructions so efficiently - which is not without significance for the control of their behavior either (Barkley, 1994). In addition, they find it difficult to generate ideas for solving problems which they come to face (Barkley, 2015b; Borkowska, 2014). The depleted repertoire of vocabulary and delayed verbal information processing will be also the cause underlying numerous academic difficulties (Lipowska et al, 2008; Qian et al, 2017).…”

Section: Why Is Verbal Fluency So Important?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Assessment of the Impact of Training With Various Metacognitive Interventions on the Enhancement of Verbal Fluency in School-Age Children With ADHD

Kajka

Kulik

2022

J Atten Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine whether a 3-month training with the use of the metacognitive strategies would strengthen the executive function related to verbal fluency in children with ADHD. Method: A total of 45 children with ADHD ( M = 10.41; SD = 1.42) participated in a randomized experimental study. They completed the Verbal Fluency Test before and after training. Result: The results of the Wilcoxon test show that the mean number of words spoken by the child increased significantly in the second measurement compared to the first in the Mind Map group ( M = 11.40; SD = 4.03; M = 14.46; SD = 3.99; p = .001). Unfortunately, this data did not apply to the Sketchnoting Group. Verbal regression was noted in the Control Group. Conclusion: The results provide an interesting premise for further research. Perhaps Mind Mapping training can be an effective form of complementary therapy.

show abstract

Dynamika działania procesów uwagi i hamowania w obecności bodźców dystrakcyjnych u dzieci z zespołem nadpobudliwości psychoruchowej z deficytem uwagi, autyzmem wysokofunkcjonującym i zaburzeniem opozycyjno-buntowniczym

Cited by 8 publications

References 14 publications

Detection of Feigned ADHD Using the MOXO-d-CPT

Detection of Feigned ADHD Using the MOXO-d-CPT

Impact of Distractors on Sustained Attention and Inhibition in Children With ADHD

The Assessment of the Impact of Training With Various Metacognitive Interventions on the Enhancement of Verbal Fluency in School-Age Children With ADHD

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About