2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamometric assessment of the mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth preparation: A comparison between two techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, highly filled epoxy resin teeth were used as replicas of natural teeth since they have a modulus of elasticity similar to that of human dentin (14.7 GPa) [24] . Other studies used human teeth, bovine, or animal teeth [18,19] . The human teeth are affected by variables caused by differences in the surface characteristics (cracks, attrition, wear), age of the extracted teeth and the storage after extraction (distilled water, saline, dry storage) [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, highly filled epoxy resin teeth were used as replicas of natural teeth since they have a modulus of elasticity similar to that of human dentin (14.7 GPa) [24] . Other studies used human teeth, bovine, or animal teeth [18,19] . The human teeth are affected by variables caused by differences in the surface characteristics (cracks, attrition, wear), age of the extracted teeth and the storage after extraction (distilled water, saline, dry storage) [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seating of the veneers using a standardized technique was adopted. Other studies used finger pressure technique which does not ensure standardization [18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The preparation design was standardized as follows: 0.5-mm facial reduction, 2-mm incisal margin reduction, 0.5-to 1-mm interproximal reduction, and a cervical margin placed 1 mm incisal to the CEJ. Finishing procedures were performed with stones (Dura-White Arkansas Stones; Shofu Dental Corp, San Marcos, CA) and hand chisels (HuFriedy, Chicago, IL) (15,19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] The ceramic materials evolution, as well as advances in techniques for adhesive cementation, contributed to a plethora of aesthetic treatments with metal-free prostheses, which simulate natural teeth and have good resistance, besides enabling more and more conservative preparations. [4][5][6][7][8] Currently, the use of contact lenses, which are nothing more than thin ceramic fragments, is an extremely aesthetic solution for presenting excellent optical properties, and considered one of the most conservative treatments for oral rehabilitation, with little or no tooth preparation, which happens to be one of its greatest advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%