1995
DOI: 10.1080/07434619512331277289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dysarthric speakers' intelligibility and speech characteristics in relation to computer speech recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with systems adapted (or developed) for dysarthric speakers, this interface achieved performance comparable to those for small vocabularies (<100 words) [9,16] and a similar level of dysarthria [9]. For a system with a similar test vocabulary (300 words) and a speaker with a similar level of dysarthria [11], the interface achieved a higher performance.…”
Section: Experiments With Dysarthric Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When compared with systems adapted (or developed) for dysarthric speakers, this interface achieved performance comparable to those for small vocabularies (<100 words) [9,16] and a similar level of dysarthria [9]. For a system with a similar test vocabulary (300 words) and a speaker with a similar level of dysarthria [11], the interface achieved a higher performance.…”
Section: Experiments With Dysarthric Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of commercial systems, such as Dragon Naturally Speaking, Microsoft Dictation, VoicePad Platinum and Infovox RA [9,10,11,12], has shown varying levels of recognition (in the range of 50% to 95%) for users with different levels of dysarthria, obtaining the best performance for small vocabularies (10 -78 words).…”
Section: Applications Of Asr On Dysarthric Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation between the ASR error rate and the human evaluation of intelligibility can then be used to develop ASR as an objective measure of speech intelligibility. Systems have evolved from simply scoring word error rates in a read passage (Ferrier et al, 1995) over word-lists to phone and phonological feature recognition in full text reading (Middag et al, 2014). It also has been shown that other approaches based on phonological modelling (Middag et al, 2009), vocal fold modelling (Bocklet et al, 2011a), or acoustic modelling can improve intelligibility measurement of speakers with pathologic voices.…”
Section: Speaker Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows the existing research carried out to determine the effect of the speech impairments on the ASR system's performance. Ferrier et.al [29] have determined the relationship between the speech intelligibility and ASR accuracy whereby high intelligibility leads to high recognition accuracy. There has also been growing interest among the researchers to explore the speech characteristics of impaired speech towards the development of ASR system which can recognize impaired speech.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%