1985
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0173(85)90027-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dysesthesias and self-mutilation in humans and subhumans: A review of clinical and experimental studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 216 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another source of evidence for induction of dysesthesias by spinal lesions has come from reports of self-mutilation (autotomy) of the distal portion of a limb by some monkeys following anterolateral chordotomy (Levitt and Levitt, 198 1;Levitt, 1985). The autotomy occurs contralateral to the lesion, and dysesthesias often occur in humans on the side opposite an anterolateral chordotomy (e.g., White, 1963;Pagni, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another source of evidence for induction of dysesthesias by spinal lesions has come from reports of self-mutilation (autotomy) of the distal portion of a limb by some monkeys following anterolateral chordotomy (Levitt and Levitt, 198 1;Levitt, 1985). The autotomy occurs contralateral to the lesion, and dysesthesias often occur in humans on the side opposite an anterolateral chordotomy (e.g., White, 1963;Pagni, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there is no evidence that sensory dysesthesia results from RTX chemoaxotomy. This is potentially a consequence of the anatomical distinctions between this approach and surgical dorsal rhizotomy, which can produce these undesirable effects in humans and in animal models (70,71). The crucial differences between cell deletion and cell axotomy underscore the value of continued investigation into highly specific molecular approaches for pain control.…”
Section: Peripheral and Central Delivery Of Rtx In Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these clinical signs occur on the side of the animal that does not display motor deficits. Levitt [64] concluded that the "deafferentation syndrome" was released by interrupting spinothalamic tracts, and that the incidence was genetically variable (incidence of 31% in a multispecies group to 95% in a group of 19 stump-tailed macaques), and that some of the variability might be related to variability in the location of the spinothalamic tracts (sometimes in the posterolateral funiculus and sometimes in the ipsilateral anterolateral funiculus) [61,64]. In those earlier studies, monkeys that had sensorimotor deficits did not display disruptions of activity level, feeding, grooming (normal dermatomes), libido, vocalization, or social behavior.…”
Section: Contributions and Implications: Safety Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%