2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.14.464365
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dysfunctional temporal stages of eye-gaze perception in adults with ADHD: a high-density EEG study

Abstract: ADHD have been associated with social cognitive impairments across the lifespan, but no studies have specifically addressed the presence of abnormalities in eye-gaze processing in the adult brain. This study investigated the neural basis of eye-gaze perception in adults with ADHD using event-related potentials (ERP). Twenty-three ADHD and 23 controls performed a delayed face-matching task with neutral faces that had either direct or averted gaze. ERPs were classified using microstate analyses. ADHD and control… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our data to not support this hypothesis, as neither the gaze-dynamics nor behavioral performance were correlated with WMC (as operationalized here). Other hypotheses regarding the factors contributing to these behaviors, to be tested in future research, include traits such as personality traits, perceptual curiosity, or tendencies of hyperactivity or inattention (Hoppe et al, 2018; Bendall et al, 2021; Maron et al, 2021; Zangrossi et al, 2021; Khatri et al, 2022; Mauriello et al, 2022; Stokes et al, 2022). Regardless of the source of this inter-subject variability, this pattern reminds us that although selective attention studies usually assume that participants allocate their attention ‘as instructed’, in practice overt attention (as well as covert attention) may fluctuate and shift spontaneously, in manners that the experimenters cannot always monitor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our data to not support this hypothesis, as neither the gaze-dynamics nor behavioral performance were correlated with WMC (as operationalized here). Other hypotheses regarding the factors contributing to these behaviors, to be tested in future research, include traits such as personality traits, perceptual curiosity, or tendencies of hyperactivity or inattention (Hoppe et al, 2018; Bendall et al, 2021; Maron et al, 2021; Zangrossi et al, 2021; Khatri et al, 2022; Mauriello et al, 2022; Stokes et al, 2022). Regardless of the source of this inter-subject variability, this pattern reminds us that although selective attention studies usually assume that participants allocate their attention ‘as instructed’, in practice overt attention (as well as covert attention) may fluctuate and shift spontaneously, in manners that the experimenters cannot always monitor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%