2020
DOI: 10.1111/hiv.12984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyslipidaemia after switch to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)‐based cART regimens in a cohort of HIV‐positive patients: what clinical relevance?

Abstract: ObjectivesSwitching from tenofovir (TDF) to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) affects lipid profile. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this results in an increased frequency of patients with low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) above their cardiovascular‐related target.MethodsAll HIV patients switching from TDF to TAF, with no changes of the anchor drug, and with plasma lipids available within 6 months before and after the switch, were included. Demographic, HIV‐related parameters, cardiovascular (CV) risk fact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several observational studies have investigated changes in lipid levels after a switch from TDF to TAF, with findings aligning with this OPERA study. In studies with postswitch lipid measurements taken a median of 1.5–12 months after switch, statistically significant increases were observed in LDL-C (range, 6–25 mg/dL) and TG (range, 12–21 mg/dL) [ 31 , 32 , 35 , 39 , 40 ]. Only 1 small observational study of 48 PWH switching from TDF to TAF found no significant difference in LDL-C and TG levels over at least 12 months on TAF, although the magnitude of change estimated was comparable to other studies [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several observational studies have investigated changes in lipid levels after a switch from TDF to TAF, with findings aligning with this OPERA study. In studies with postswitch lipid measurements taken a median of 1.5–12 months after switch, statistically significant increases were observed in LDL-C (range, 6–25 mg/dL) and TG (range, 12–21 mg/dL) [ 31 , 32 , 35 , 39 , 40 ]. Only 1 small observational study of 48 PWH switching from TDF to TAF found no significant difference in LDL-C and TG levels over at least 12 months on TAF, although the magnitude of change estimated was comparable to other studies [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in 1 study of PWH switching from TDF to TAF who maintained their anchor agent, increases in lipids were observed after switch, regardless of the regimen. However, the magnitude of change differed by regimen, and when cardiovascular risk was assessed, those using cobicistat were 2.5 times more likely to have an LDL-C level above the cardiovascular target compared with PWH not using cobicistat [ 40 ]. In this OPERA study, while changes in lipids were not estimated for different regimens, the use of PIs and boosting agents was nonetheless controlled for in statistical models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have an influence. It has been currently reported, that switch from Tenofovir Disoproxil (TDF) to Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) worsens lipid parameters among HIV patients [24,25]. In our study, TAF was the most commonly used antiretroviral drug.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 72%
“…The magnitude of lipid increases observed in this study (CHOL: + 7.9%, LDL: + 11.1%, HDL: + 7.1%, TG: + 23.8%) was consistent with the results of a smaller observational study of 238 PLWH switching from TDF to TAF, which reported statistically significant relative increases in CHOL, LDL and HDL of a similar magnitude to those reported here [ 19 22 ]. However, other observational studies reported larger statistically significantly increases in lipids for up to 6 months after switch [ 18 ]. Nevertheless, the statistically significant increases in lipid levels reported in this OPERA study are consistent with the literature comparing lipid changes with TAF compared to TDF [ 15 – 17 , 28 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nonetheless, many people living with HIV (PLWH) on stable TDF-containing regimens have been switched to TAF to avoid potential bone and renal toxicity [ 14 ]. The impact of switching directly from TDF to TAF on lipids has been explored in a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [ 15 – 17 ] and small observational studies [ 18 22 ]. While these studies showed small but statistically significant increases in lipid levels after switching away from TDF at a population level, the clinical relevance of these changes, specifically in relation to risk of cardiovascular disease, remains unclear, as does the real-world impact of removing TDF on lipids in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%