2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-25 | Ultra-thin Everolimus-eluting Stents in Atherosclerotic Lesions: Three Years Follow-up with Subgroup Analysis of Ultra-long Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A registry of Tetrilimus EES on real-world patients also reported similar incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at three-year follow-up in overall (9.1 %) as well as in patient with long coronary lesions (10.4 % in >40 mm lesion length). 19 For purpose of comparison, three-year rates of device-oriented clinical events (DoCE) for other ultrathin DES include—10.5 % with MiStent SES vs 11.5 % with Xience EES in DESSOLVE III trial 23 ; 8.1 % with Supraflex SES vs 9.4 % with Xience EES in TALENT trial 13 ; 8.2 % with Orsiro SES vs 13.6 % with Xience EES in BIOFLOW V trial 24 ; 6.7 % with Orsiro SES vs 7.5 % with Synergy EES in BIO-RESORT trial 25 ; and 9.0 % with Orsiro SES vs 9.1 % with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent in SORT OUT VII trial. 26 Similarly, T-FLEX registry ( n = 1203) reported 8.1 % TLF rate with Supraflex Cruz SES (ultrathin biodegradable polymer-coated stent with the LDZ link) in real-world Indian patients up to 3-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A registry of Tetrilimus EES on real-world patients also reported similar incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at three-year follow-up in overall (9.1 %) as well as in patient with long coronary lesions (10.4 % in >40 mm lesion length). 19 For purpose of comparison, three-year rates of device-oriented clinical events (DoCE) for other ultrathin DES include—10.5 % with MiStent SES vs 11.5 % with Xience EES in DESSOLVE III trial 23 ; 8.1 % with Supraflex SES vs 9.4 % with Xience EES in TALENT trial 13 ; 8.2 % with Orsiro SES vs 13.6 % with Xience EES in BIOFLOW V trial 24 ; 6.7 % with Orsiro SES vs 7.5 % with Synergy EES in BIO-RESORT trial 25 ; and 9.0 % with Orsiro SES vs 9.1 % with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent in SORT OUT VII trial. 26 Similarly, T-FLEX registry ( n = 1203) reported 8.1 % TLF rate with Supraflex Cruz SES (ultrathin biodegradable polymer-coated stent with the LDZ link) in real-world Indian patients up to 3-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 26 Furthermore, the results of another real-world registry on Tetrilimus EES also reported similar incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis in overall (0.4 %) and even in long lesion (>40 mm) subgroup (1.4 %) at three-year follow-up. 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation