2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2008.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-Bayesian estimation and hierarchical Bayesian estimation of failure rate

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper introduces a new method, E-Bayesian estimation method, to estimate failure rate. The method is suitable for the censored or truncated data with small sample sizes and high reliability. The definition and properties of E-Bayesian estimation are given. A real data set is discussed, which shows that the method is both efficiency and easy to operate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Han [16], the prior parameters α and β should be selected to guarantee that f (θ|α, β) is a decreasing function of θ. The derivative of f (θ|α, β) with respect to θ is…”
Section: E-bayesian Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Han [16], the prior parameters α and β should be selected to guarantee that f (θ|α, β) is a decreasing function of θ. The derivative of f (θ|α, β) with respect to θ is…”
Section: E-bayesian Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper introduces a new method, called E-Bayesian estimation(see Han [6]), to estimate parameter and reliability function of Generalized Half Logistic distribution when progressive Type II censoring is performed. Based on the results shown in Table-1, one can conclude, Generally, the MSE of the E-Bayesian estimates of β are the smallest MSE as the as compared with the Bayesian estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBMi i   Lemma 5: It follows from (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) …”
Section: Relations Among ˆ( 123)unclassified
“…We considered different sample sizes c  for these cases, we genera for e from the uniform priors distributions (0, 1) and (0, c) respectively given in (3-4), (3)(4)(5) and (3)(4)(5)(6). , (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and (3-21) respectively. We repeated this process 10000 times and compute the Mean Square Error (MSE) for the estimates for different censoring schemes (different values of , nr) and given values of ,, cs where and  stands for an estimator of  .…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%