2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-CMS: A new design spectrum for nuclear structures in high levels of seismic hazard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other complementary selection criteria include the soil profile, which may alter and/or amplify response spectra at specific periods of interest and the strong motion duration causing damage accumulation (Iervolino et al 2006). Spectral matching between a target spectrum and the response spectrum (Bommer et al 2003;Ambraseys et al 2004), which can also take into account the spectral shape (Baker and Cornell 2005;Mousavi et al 2012), may also be used for assessment of seismic vulnerability. The spectral shape is considered by means of the parameter ''epsilon'' (''e'') that expresses the number of standard deviations by which a given IM differs from the mean predicted IM value, where both values are expressed in logarithmic terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other complementary selection criteria include the soil profile, which may alter and/or amplify response spectra at specific periods of interest and the strong motion duration causing damage accumulation (Iervolino et al 2006). Spectral matching between a target spectrum and the response spectrum (Bommer et al 2003;Ambraseys et al 2004), which can also take into account the spectral shape (Baker and Cornell 2005;Mousavi et al 2012), may also be used for assessment of seismic vulnerability. The spectral shape is considered by means of the parameter ''epsilon'' (''e'') that expresses the number of standard deviations by which a given IM differs from the mean predicted IM value, where both values are expressed in logarithmic terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Figure 7(a) and (b), the Eta based median collapse capacity is a little higher than the Epsilon based median collapse capacity, especially when the variations of the target spectrum are taken into consideration. This is an evidence that the conventional Epsilon based target spectrum can result in underestimation of structural demand [22].…”
Section: Mean Annual Frequency Of Collapse As a Function Of Target Pementioning
confidence: 88%
“…It has a higher level of correlation with the nonlinear structural response when compared with the case of the conventional spectral acceleration epsilon. For this reason, it was used as a new proxy for the calculation of the conditional spectra . The target spectral acceleration epsilon and the target eta are necessary to calculate the conditional spectra.…”
Section: Why Do We Need Conditional Spectra?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A closed form model was proposed in a previous study to obtain ρ'ηTηT*. The stepwise calculation of the conditional spectra, based on the exact eta, is as follows: Considering the seismic source and its characteristics and the structural properties like the first mode period ( T *), PSHA can be performed, and the results can be obtained regarding S a versus hazard and PGV versus hazard. By considering a hazard level and obtaining its equivalent S a , it is possible to compute a related probability density function based on Equation and the mean value of magnitude using Equation .…”
Section: Why Do We Need Conditional Spectra?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation