2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68198-2_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-inclusion Prediction Modelling in Blended Learning Courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we decided to use the ensemble method -voting to provide improvement of prediction model performance (Kumari et al, 2018). In our previous study, we tested 5 classifiers Naive Bayes, SimpleLogistic, lazy.LWL, OneR, and LMT for three different blended learning courses (Vitolina, & Kapenieks, 2020). Our previous study has not shown that any of the classifiers perform best in all courses.…”
Section: Prediction Model1: Classification Based E-inclusion Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this study, we decided to use the ensemble method -voting to provide improvement of prediction model performance (Kumari et al, 2018). In our previous study, we tested 5 classifiers Naive Bayes, SimpleLogistic, lazy.LWL, OneR, and LMT for three different blended learning courses (Vitolina, & Kapenieks, 2020). Our previous study has not shown that any of the classifiers perform best in all courses.…”
Section: Prediction Model1: Classification Based E-inclusion Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%