E-Leadership and Teacher Development Using ICT

Mishra, Punya; Henriksen, Danah; Boltz, Liz Owens; Richardson, Carmen

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47956-8_13

Cited by 21 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…-the application of technology acceptance and adoption models (Akcil et al, 2017;Boyd & Sampson, 2016;King & Boyatt, 2015;Livingstone, 2015;Markova, 2014;Sutton & DeSantis, 2017;Van Wart et al, 2017); -the application of tools and methods from the business world, as suggested by Sangrà (2009), with the caveat of the necessary cultural adaptation to HE (Chow, 2013;Mishra et al, 2016;Spackman et al, 2015;Tay & Low, 2017); -using data for decision-making (Brown et al, 2016;Burnette, 2015;Persichitte, 2013); -studying TEL adoption from the point of view of organisational learning (Tintoré & Arbós, 2013;Trevitt et al, 2017); -personal digital competence / literacy / confidence, of both leaders and staff (Akcil et al, 2017;Boyd & Sampson, 2016;Brown et al, 2016;DomingoCoscollola et al, 2016).…”

Section: Trendsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three of the results provide an analysis of leadership theories in relation to the integration of technology for teaching and learning, taking e-leadership as understood in (Brown, 2013) QUAL Exploratory case studies (Singh & Hardaker, 2017) Single institution 1 QUAL Action research (Roushan et al, 2016) Faculty level 2 QUAL Phenomenology: focus groups, individual interviews (King & Boyatt, 2015) QUAL Interviews (Trevitt et al, 2017) Project level 2 QUAL practical inquiry and community of inquiry (Garrison & Vaughan, 2013) QUAL case study (Stoddart, 2015) business and relating it to the field of education (Mishra, Henriksen, Boltz, & Richardson, 2016), or developing a model of TEL leadership (Markova, 2014). Others focus on the acceptance of technology by HE teaching staff with recommendations for HE leadership to integrate the implications of different models of technology acceptance (Rogers' (1962(Rogers' ( , 2003 diffusion model, Davis' (1989) technology acceptance model and Mishra and Koehler's (2006) technological, pedagogical and content knowledge TPACK model) in Continuous Professional Development (Sutton & DeSantis, 2017).…”

Section: Theoretical Analyses 2013-2017mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dawn or dusk of the 5th age of research in educational technology? A literature review on (e-)leadership for technology-enhanced learning in higher education (2013-2017)

Arnold

Sangrà

2018

Int J Educ Technol High Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this article is to establish the extent to which the concept of e-leadership has taken off as a lens through which to study leadership for technology-enhanced learning (TEL) in higher education. Building on a previous study conducted in 2013, this article thus covers an exploratory review of the literature for the period 2103-2017. It analyses 49 articles which explore both the specific concept of e-leadership as well as other work dealing more generally with leadership and organisational change for TEL in higher education. The findings show that while none of the empirical studies identified in the literature refer explicitly to e-leadership, there are a number of interesting insights to be found in the theoretical articles. The results also highlight the widely different interpretations and applications of the concept of e-leadership and the consequent need for the definition to be refined. The paper concludes with recommendations for further multidisciplinary research at the intersection of the fields of educational technology and educational management, focusing on values, strategy, organisation and leadership interactions at meso level, the economy and public policy at macro level, and teaching and learning at the micro level, as well as for research in Leadership Development for TEL.

show abstract

Section: Trendsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Analyses 2013-2017mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dawn or dusk of the 5th age of research in educational technology? A literature review on (e-)leadership for technology-enhanced learning in higher education (2013-2017)

Arnold

Sangrà

2018

Int J Educ Technol High Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the beginning, the research on e-leadership focuses more on business and non-educational area. This is supported by Mishra, Henriksen, Boltz, & Richardson (2016) who stated that most research on e-leadership focus mainly on business and management sectors.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 81%

“…On the other hand, Mishra et al (2016) found that there is a significant gap in how we perceive about teacher professional development in the domain of ICT.…”

Section: Training and Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, research has shown that a teacher's beliefs and attitudes are often strong indicators of their planning, instructional decisions, classroom practices and their ability to use technology (Bullock, 2004;Celep & Tülübaş, 2014;Lu, Yu, Liu, & Yao, 2003;Mishra et al, 2016). However, the most significant influence on how teachers' actually use the ICT is the knowledge they have on the specific educational technology.…”

Section: Training and Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Explorative Review of E-Leadership Studies

Oh¹,

Chua²

2018

IOJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to explore the field of educational leadership and educational technology innovations. In order to understand the extent to which e-leadership was discussed, content analyses on selected conference papers, book chapters, thesis and professional journals spanning across 2000 to 2016 was conducted. An extensive review of the literature found a total of 45 articles mainly on e-leadership, virtual leadership, leading virtual teams, school ICT leadership and e-leaders in both education and non-educational setting. These articles focus on six main themes of eleadership, which are challenges, leadership styles, trust building, training and development, culture, e-leader skills and guidelines. Findings indicate that empirical studies on e-leadership are scarce and more studies in this area need to be conducted in the digital era. In addition, a proposed model of e-leadership effectiveness and variables that are associated with e-leadership is included in this paper. Subsequently, the missing link for future studies is discussed.

show abstract