Proceedings of the 2008 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A) 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1368044.1368070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-learning 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(ej., chat, videoconferencias, blogs, correos electrónicos, etc.). Un enfoque diferente centrado en las herramientas que mejoran la colaboración es We-LCoME (Ferretti et al, 2008). Esta herramienta se orienta a contextos educativos en los que se necesite cooperar y compartir recursos de Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (smil).…”
Section: Requerimientos Para Una Plataforma Colaborativaunclassified
“…(ej., chat, videoconferencias, blogs, correos electrónicos, etc.). Un enfoque diferente centrado en las herramientas que mejoran la colaboración es We-LCoME (Ferretti et al, 2008). Esta herramienta se orienta a contextos educativos en los que se necesite cooperar y compartir recursos de Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (smil).…”
Section: Requerimientos Para Una Plataforma Colaborativaunclassified
“…Based on the rationale of Web 2.0, Huang & Shiu (2012) [12] proposes a user-centric Elearning 2.0 system (UALS), which conducts sequential pattern mining to construct adaptive learning paths to collect users' collective intelligence, and employs Item Response Theory (IRT) with collaborative voting to estimate learners' abilities for materials recommendation. By inviting learners to be "prosumers", Ferretti et al (2008) [13] presents an E-learning 2.0 tool to support users in editing educational resources and compounding multimedia contents through collaborative work. Cristea & Ghali (2011) [14] study how to effectively combine the peers' recommendation with content adaptation to enhance the learning outcome in an E-learning 2.0 environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to share educational resources is reflected into annotation systems. Some tools allow to exchange annotations by e-mail or instant messaging software as ICQ8 for We-LCoME [28]. From the proposal of W3C recommendation for the RDF-schema, designers of annotation systems intend to use this formalization to PAPER FUNCTIONALITIES PROVIDED BY ANNOTATION SYSTEMS FOR LEARNERS IN EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT: AN OVERVIEW represent annotations.…”
Section: E To Share Annotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items in this list are inserted at the end of document displayed in a section entitled 'to read'. Ferretti et al, [28] present a prototype of annotation system called We-LCoME which determines by means of judgments (sentences), expressed towards the annotated passages, a value of correlation between learners. Thus, students who have similar profiles are mutualized to create an information exchange.…”
Section: G To Recommend Data Related To Annotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%