E-Learning and Virtual Science Centers
DOI: 10.4018/9781591405917.ch014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-Learning and Virtual Science Centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The derived values for H 0 vary simply as 1/l max . Though the error bars are considerable, the plausible assumptions we have made yield results for H 0 that agree generally with the range spanned by current measurements (Schechter et al 1996;Giovanelli et al 1996;Sandage & Tammann 1996;Kim et al 1997;Falco et al 1997;Holzapfel et al 1997), with the unified model giving higher values. This in turn suggests that our model and input assumptions are in fact reasonable.…”
Section: Cosmological Parameterssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The derived values for H 0 vary simply as 1/l max . Though the error bars are considerable, the plausible assumptions we have made yield results for H 0 that agree generally with the range spanned by current measurements (Schechter et al 1996;Giovanelli et al 1996;Sandage & Tammann 1996;Kim et al 1997;Falco et al 1997;Holzapfel et al 1997), with the unified model giving higher values. This in turn suggests that our model and input assumptions are in fact reasonable.…”
Section: Cosmological Parameterssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…While it is intriguing that our results are roughly consistent with those seen in these two independent surveys done at different wavelengths, we remain cautious for now since the effect is only seen in our faintest bins. Other large, contiguous surveys now underway (Dey & Jannuzi 1997, Falco 1997 should provide an important check on this result. We note that the constraints on r o and ǫ discussed above do not change if we exclude the two faintest points from the analysis.…”
Section: Dependence Of the Slope On Magnitudementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Small but nonzero differential reddening was also detected for three other lenses (HE1104-1805, H1413+117 and B1422+231). The lensed quasars SDSS0246-0825, HS0810+2554, FBQ1633+3134 and SDSS1138+0314 were not part of the sample studied by Falco et al (1999). We studied the latter object in §2.1 and concluded images B and C did not show evidence for differential reddening between them, but there is no information in this regard for the other three quasars.…”
Section: IV Compared To Hα and Hβmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reddening by the lens galaxy will typically vary between quasar images. Falco et al (1999) studied most of the objects in our sample and found that only two of them showed significant differential reddening: SBS0909+523 (∆E(B − V ) = 0.2 mag for image B with respect to A, see also Appendix A) and Q2237+0305 (∆E(B − V ) = 0.18 and 0.17 mag for images C and D with respect to A). Small but nonzero differential reddening was also detected for three other lenses (HE1104-1805, H1413+117 and B1422+231).…”
Section: IV Compared To Hα and Hβmentioning
confidence: 99%