We examined life cycle plasticity in two populations of the copepod Paralabidocera antarctica, one of which inhabits the coastal sea ice belt of Antarctica and the other of which has been isolated in a nearby saline lake for several thousand generations. Similarities in the life cycles of the two populations included long overwintering phases (Ͼ5 months) by late-stage nauplii, rapid development through the copepodid stages, and a short adult life span of 2-3 weeks. Adults appeared in late spring or early summer and spawned and died soon after. However, the life cycle of the lacustrine population was much less tightly regulated than at the marine site; animals were rarely found living within the lake ice, and synchrony in the developmental cycle was diminished. It is likely that a combination of factors, including ice hardness, a lack of predation threat, and a consistent food supply has freed the lacustrine population from the constraints imposed by living within the ice cover. Instantaneous growth rates calculated for the marine site showed a variable growth rate (0.04-0.14 d Ϫ1 ). The lacustrine population in general had faster growth rates than the marine population (0.10-0.26 d Ϫ1 ) and reached maturity at a smaller size. This is attributed, in part, to the higher environmental temperatures experienced by the lacustrine population.The life history strategies of marine zooplankton are influenced by the physical and chemical environment they inhabit and by other biota in that environment. Because perturbations in physical and biological aspects of marine ecosystems are common on both temporal and spatial scales, plasticity in the life cycles of zooplankton can facilitate their continued exploitation of a habitat.Copepods are an important component of most zooplankton assemblages, and factors that influence their growth and development will have a significant effect on secondary production and energy transfer through the marine food web. Although some species (e.g., Oithona similis) appear to be circumglobal in their distribution (Conover and Huntley 1991), others are restricted to narrower geographical ranges. Species with restricted distributions are constrained from inhabiting previously unoccupied environments by a combination of physical (e.g