E-participation adoption models research in the last 17 years: A weight and meta-analytical review

Naranjo-Zolotov, Mijail; Oliveira, Tiago; Casteleyn, Sven

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.031

Cited by 111 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Aggregating the previously discussed aspects, digitized individuals are the constituting actors of our society and as such, distinct opportunities and challenges arise owing to the increasing digitization of many individuals. Previous research has for instance accounted for how digital technologies affect the individual's engagement in political processes (Anduiza et al 2012;Bennett 2008;Naranjo Zolotov et al 2018). For instance, there are recommender systems that can affect public opinion making and lead to technology-induced filter bubbles, and that can potentially impact opinion making processes (Matt et al 2014).…”

Section: Digitized Individual As Citizeninteracting With Societymentioning

confidence: 99%

The digitization of the individual: conceptual foundations and opportunities for research

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Digitized Individual As Citizeninteracting With Societymentioning

confidence: 99%

The digitization of the individual: conceptual foundations and opportunities for research

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Previous studies of the factors that drive the adoption of e-participation have used theoretical models in the context of technology adoption (Naranjo Zolotov et al, 2018). Using only theoretical models of technology adoption may not provide a strong theoretical basis of the general factors that drive the adoption of e-participation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation

Naranjo-Zolotov

Oliveira

Casteleyn

2019

ITP

Self Cite

131

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to investigate how citizens' perception of empowerment can influence the intention to use and intention to recommend e-participation. Design/methodology/approach-A research model is evaluated using structural equation modelling. An online survey questionnaire was used to collect data from 210 users of e-participation. Findings-The results show that psychological empowerment influences the intention to use and recommend e-participation. Performance expectancy and facilitating conditions were the strongest predictors of intention to use; effort expectancy and social influence had no significant effect on the prediction of intention to use e-participation. Research limitations/implications-The use of psychological empowerment as a higher-order multidimensional construct is still insufficiently researched. Future research may explore the effect of each dimension of psychological empowerment in different scenarios of e-participation adoption. Caution is needed when generalising our findings towards the adoption of e-participation in different locations or with different participants. Practical implications-The findings can help the local governments to design strategies for the promotion and diffusion of e-participation amongst the citizenry. Those strategies should focus on citizens' perception of empowerment, thereby creating a positive attitude towards intention to use and recommend e-participation. Originality/value-An innovative research model integrates the unified theory of acceptance, use of technology and psychological empowerment; the last as a higher-order construct.

show abstract

“…Instrumente, die dazu dienen, konkrete Beschlüsse umzusetzen, haben einen höheren Einfluss als solche, die nur Lösungsansätze generieren oder Probleme offenlegen. Die hohe Einflussmacht eines Instruments erhöht den wahrgenommenen Nutzen und somit die Partizipationswahrscheinlichkeit (Naranjo Zolotov et al 2018).…”

Section: Einflussmachtunclassified

Partizipation im digitalen Staat: Möglichkeiten und Bedeutung digitaler und analoger Partizipationsinstrumente im Vergleich

Fischer

Brändle

Mertes

et al. 2020

Yearbook of Swiss Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mit der fortschreitenden Digitalisierung eröffnet sich für Verwaltungen die Möglichkeit, durch den Einsatz sogenannter E-Partizipationsinstrumente, Bürgerbeteiligung auch digital anzubieten. Dieser Artikel stellt sich die Frage, welche Chancen und Risiken bezüglich des Prozesses, der Akzeptanz und der Ergebnisse bei digitaler Partizipation im Vergleich zu analoger zu erwarten sind. Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage werden verschiedene Partizipationsinstrumente bewertet, von denen sowohl eine digitale als auch eine analoge Form existiert. Um diese Bewertung vorzunehmen, wurde auf Basis einer Literaturrecherche ein Kriterienkatalog erarbeitet. Die Resultate der Gegenüberstellung zeigen die in der Literatur diskutierten Vorteile von digitalen gegenüber analogen Partizipationsinstrumenten, wie geringerer Zeitaufwand, tiefere Kosten, einfachere Zugänglichkeit sowie ein höheres Inklusionspotential auf. Gleichzeitig wird deutlich, dass digitale Instrumente zwar bezüglich Prozesskriterien den analogen Formen überlegen sind, sie dafür jedoch schlechter bezüglich Argumentationsmöglichkeiten und Aktivierungspotential abschneiden.

show abstract

E-participation adoption models research in the last 17 years: A weight and meta-analytical review

Cited by 111 publications

References 65 publications

The digitization of the individual: conceptual foundations and opportunities for research

The digitization of the individual: conceptual foundations and opportunities for research

Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation

Partizipation im digitalen Staat: Möglichkeiten und Bedeutung digitaler und analoger Partizipationsinstrumente im Vergleich

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About