Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2912160.2912227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-petition Information Diffusion in Online Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results, peer influence and value-expressive influence have a positive influence on attitude, whereas utilitarian influence fails to shape attitude. The empirical evidence echoes one of the main trends of e-petition studies, which emphasizes the role of social media (Asher et al, 2019; C. L. Dumas et al, 2016; Vicente & Novo, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to the results, peer influence and value-expressive influence have a positive influence on attitude, whereas utilitarian influence fails to shape attitude. The empirical evidence echoes one of the main trends of e-petition studies, which emphasizes the role of social media (Asher et al, 2019; C. L. Dumas et al, 2016; Vicente & Novo, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…J. Carman, 2006; Hough, 2012; Lindner & Riehm, 2011), enable political participation (Alathur et al, 2012; Lee et al, 2014; Morva, 2016; Toland, 2011), the e-petition systems per se (Bershadskaya et al, 2013; C. Dumas et al, 2017; Leston-Bandeira, 2019; Wright, 2012), the role of social media (Asher et al, 2019; C. L. Dumas et al, 2016; Vicente & Novo, 2014), and the role of petition users (Hale et al, 2013; Jungherr & Jürgens, 2010; Puschmann et al, 2017; Ulo et al, 2019; Wright, 2015, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Petitions are an excellent data source for understanding the concerns and priorities of citizens. They can be considered 'big data' as they contain large amounts of time-stamped granular transactional data and are available in real time (Dumas et al 2016). However, at present they are underutilized in social scientific research and government services.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Two Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%