“…which is the term that represents the field of both the contributions and , and is a reflection coefficient for hard/vertical polarization for positive incidence over the cylinders: (4) where is the so-called transition function, which is defined in terms of a Fresnel integral, is the Fock scattering function for hard polarization [18], and (5) where (6) and (7) Moreover, , which is the relative amplitude of the incident plane wave, is the wave number, and and form the first cylinder over which the formulation presented in [17] for the evaluation of the multiple diffraction of a plane wave by a series of cylinders is applied-assuming a positive incidence angle (lit region), which implies the calculation of both and .-Furthermore, the second term of (2) can be calculated as (8) where , is the above-mentioned reflection coefficient for hard/vertical polarization given by (4), where in this case (9) and (10) and and are assumed to be the same point, with (11) where is the diffraction coefficient for an edge given in [19], is the length of the faces of the horn, is the half-angle of the aperture of the horn, and (12) In this case, in order to evaluate , one first diffraction at the edge of the end of the lower arm of the horn is considered, ( and are approximated by the same point, as occurs in the case of a non-corrugated horn), therefore obtaining the field existing over the subsequent cylinder . Then, the remaining multiple-cylinder diffraction is calculated by considering a grazing incidence over the cylinders, since the direct ray was already considered in (3), where the smaller angle of incidence makes the effect of the multiple diffraction much more relevant than that arising at the array of corrugations of the lower arm of the horn, where the angle of incidence is greater (13) with (14) where is the diffraction coefficient for hard/vertical polarization for negative incidence over the cylinders (shadow region): (15) with (16) where (17) and…”